GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
now fox is making a big deal that Obama hasn't been to church since his inauguration, but then again thats because fox pretty much appeals to the lower common denominators of this country.
That's just brilliant! I wish religion wouldn't win votes. When Tony Blair was questioned about his religious beliefs, his spokesman interrupted saying 'We don't do god.'
Quote:
I don't doubt that the DPRK could be dangerous, hell, so is a nest of wasps, thats why you DON'T do anything to get them riled up, but Bush like the ignoramus that he is, did, and now look how far the DPRK has been pushed.
As far as I'm concerned, no country should be allowed to develop WMD (including those so called 'responsible' countries - are there any?). Unfortunately, I can't see the world's superpowers suddenly saying "Actually, you know what, sod it, we don't need those nuclear bombs, gases, etc. let's destroy them, sit down, have a cup of tea and chat about our countries' secret plans and complexes."
...So the problem remains and no wonder that some other countries are secretly working on wmd: If you've got a bomb, I want to have one as well - and FYI my bomb will be bigger than yours.
As far as I'm concerned, no country should be allowed to develop WMD (including those so called 'responsible' countries - are there any?). Unfortunately, I can't see the world's superpowers suddenly saying "Actually, you know what, sod it, we don't need those nuclear bombs, gases, etc. let's destroy them, sit down, have a cup of tea and chat about our countries' secret plans and complexes."
...So the problem remains and no wonder that some other countries are secretly working on wmd: If you've got a bomb, I want to have one as well - and FYI my bomb will be bigger than yours.
You can't put the genie back in the bottle. Nuclear weapons exist and will continue to exist.
Talk of eliminating them is just foolish; the side that disarms first is the side that will be taken out. Talk to Israel about that one.
Also, this talk of eliminating nukes completely ignores the reason we built them in the first place. Not only are they very effective weapons - the mere threat of their use held the Soviet Union off for over 50 years - but they are dirt cheap.
We built our nuclear deterrent force specifically because it was so very much cheaper than building and maintaining the conventional force levels that would have been required if we had not relied on nukes.
The world is no less dangerous now than it was 50 years ago, and it is probably less predictable now than it was then. If we want to get rid of nukes, we need to be prepared to increase our defense budget by a huge margin.
Rather than talking about the naive and foolish idea of eliminating nukes, we need to talk about the ability to defend against them.
Rather than talking about the naive and foolish idea of eliminating nukes, we need to talk about the ability to defend against them.
I was [edit: obviously I meant: NOT] seriously suggesting eliminating nukes. It's too late. Nobody is going to disarm. In today's world it would be tantamount to committing a suicide. I just don't like the direction it's heading. How are we going to defend against them? We will build more and more sophisticated anti-nuke defence systems, which, in turn, will entail building more and more sophisticated wmd and so on and so forth until one day a cleaner lady will push a little red button and the other side will not believe that it was an accident...
Quote:
More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One
path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total
extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, Rupert Murdoch joins the Council on Foreign Affairs (in New York) and starts promoting Hillary as his new puppet, er, associate.
We better get back to discussing Al Qaeda pirates before some realizes what's really going on here.
It's been on my mind for the last coupe of days. Do crimes against humanity get outdated? I mean if someone did it in the past, can they still be prosecuted now?
The Hague? That's not run by Shiites is it? Good thing the Kurds and Armenians don't have anything to say about genocide. That would just ruin everything for the propaganda machine.
Kill 300,000 Kurds, not a crime against humanity (because our "friends" in Turkey like killing them too). Kill 150 Shiites who were trying to assassinate you, you're Hitler reincarnated.
Yeah, as I said before "crimes against humanity" is a BS term used by governments against whoever they don't like. The real crimes are overlooked, covered up, forgotten. The real crimes are often done by those who come up with these terms, they're the ones trying to cover it up.
I wonder, is there a site with a list of lies the government has told ... or rather it should be a list of truths as it would be astronomically shorter.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.