LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2012, 03:19 AM   #31
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigevil View Post
oh crap does that mean I am in trouble.
Just don't start using FreeBSD or (some) people might jump to conclusions...
 
Old 06-02-2012, 03:22 PM   #32
NyteOwl
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Anyone who doesn't use something because they don't like a technical term is the one who's immature. Probably not evn Christian either heh
 
Old 06-02-2012, 03:32 PM   #33
fogpipe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Slackware 64 -current,
Posts: 550

Rep: Reputation: 196Reputation: 196
You know, i used to help out in my dads hardware business and i was never comfortable with the term "nuts" entirely too suggestive. I propose that it be changed to octagonal screwy bits. Unless of course anyone objects to "screwy" or "bits".
 
Old 06-02-2012, 06:30 PM   #34
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,711
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635
Your idea is nice, but too late. Crazy people are no longer call nuts. They are now "psychologically challenged."
And yes. "Screwy" bits is offensive.
Your nuts example points to an interesting example of the stupidity of the issue. A small number of idiots find terms like daemon offensive, but not terms like header. Perhaps I am a little perverted, but the word "header" can be easily interpreted as a sexual innuendo. Why do these "Christian" zealots not complain about those kind of terms?

Last edited by Randicus Draco Albus; 06-02-2012 at 06:33 PM.
 
Old 06-02-2012, 06:46 PM   #35
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
I think if one is to start finding computer terms offensive then one must start with "Master" and "Slave", heck, even "Primary" and "Secondary" are indicative of am abusive hierarchical relationship.
Then we get onto the salacious subject of "male" and "female" "ports" and adaptors...
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:44 AM   #36
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,928

Rep: Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612
I think everything should just be called a 'thingy', followed by a long explanation of what the thingy is or does. That seems tp be the future of the English language anyway, where nothing means what it says and nobody is capable of saying what they mean by any means...
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:57 AM   #37
fogpipe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Slackware 64 -current,
Posts: 550

Rep: Reputation: 196Reputation: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnashley View Post
I think everything should just be called a 'thingy', followed by a long explanation of what the thingy is or does. That seems tp be the future of the English language anyway, where nothing means what it says and nobody is capable of saying what they mean by any means...
Thats funny
 
Old 06-03-2012, 05:10 PM   #38
baldy3105
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Is that thingy, as opposed to a whatsit? To be differentiated of course from a whojamaflip, a doin's, a jobby or a do-dah?
 
Old 06-04-2012, 02:38 AM   #39
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,928

Rep: Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612
Also distinct from do-hickey, thingamajig and what(ch)yamacallit. Thingys are those things that use for you-know-what. Note that the more intellectual types mostly use the alternate spelling: thingies. Commoners from some regions (ahem), may pronounce it as: 'fingys', and those from southern and western areas of elsewhere(other side of Pond) pronounce it as: 'thangs'.
 
Old 06-04-2012, 03:37 AM   #40
Roken
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Location: Warrington, UK
Distribution: Arch local, Debian on VPS, several RPIs.
Posts: 300
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 55
On the 666/616 thing, I'm pretty sure the confusion is caused because it was calculated using an old Intel P4 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
 
Old 06-04-2012, 07:28 AM   #41
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,302
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
Deja-vu...again! Call them "thingies" - that shouldn't offend anyone (except sensible Linux users, but we don't matter).
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnashley View Post
Note that the more intellectual types mostly use the alternate spelling: thingies.
Are you implying that I'm an intellectual? Well, I'm offended , but I've been called worse names...can't repeat them here, though.
 
Old 06-04-2012, 09:34 AM   #42
baldy3105
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
So are people who look at Windows all day peeping toms? I call that disgusting. And as for hard drives, well!, And floppy? I see what you did there. RAM refers to memory? Really?

filth! you're all perverts....

P.S. just realized my laptop has a CD "slot" on it!!! Horrors! And all those sockets!!!

I shall have to stop using PC's they are just so disgusting!

Last edited by baldy3105; 06-04-2012 at 09:36 AM.
 
Old 06-04-2012, 09:53 AM   #43
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by fogpipe View Post
You know, i used to help out in my dads hardware business and i was never comfortable with the term "nuts" entirely too suggestive. I propose that it be changed to octagonal screwy bits. Unless of course anyone objects to "screwy" or "bits".
No no no, we need an acronym. I suggest 'The Hexagonal Engineer-designed Naturally Useful Tightening System'.
 
Old 06-04-2012, 05:35 PM   #44
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,711
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldy3105 View Post
So are people ...
I shall have to stop using PC's they are just so disgusting!

Nice.
 
Old 06-04-2012, 06:15 PM   #45
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,264

Rep: Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340Reputation: 5340
Reminds me of this old gem:

Quote:
Tech Support: "All right...now double-click on the File Manager icon."
Customer: "That's why I hate this Windows, because of the icons, I'm a Protestant,and I don't believe in icons."
Tech Support: "Well, that's just an industry term sir. I don't believe it was meant to...
Customer: "I don't care about any Industry Terms. I don't believe in icons."
Tech Support: "Well...why don't you click on the little picture of a file cabinet...is little picture OK?"
c [click]
http://www.easydesksoftware.com/humor.htm
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Not sure what "console-kit-daemon --no-daemon" means mark_alfred Linux - General 2 12-18-2011 04:59 PM
Bash script to verify the daemon is working if not, start the daemon kishoreru Linux - Newbie 7 09-23-2009 04:29 AM
Enable daemon to run with service daemon start,etc baddah Programming 6 12-02-2007 05:51 PM
problem in perl replace command with slash (/) in search/replace string ramesh_ps1 Red Hat 4 09-10-2003 01:04 AM
term in Vi NSKL Linux - Software 19 12-04-2002 01:29 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration