GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
the decision is the direct result of a court verdict that MS is a monopoly and engages in antitrust and unfair business practices. with the Open Source movement and way of doing things gaining momentum, MS is looking more and more like a dinosaur from any forward-looking perspective.
(i know i shouldn't gloat, but i can't help it)
>edit: fixed link
Last edited by synaptical; 12-31-2003 at 01:05 PM.
Open source would be cheaper,has got quality and as it is open,there wont be any spying,and there is virtually no reason to turn to Windows for government business.This must be the most valid reason for more and more governments to turn to linux.
I dont know whether this has got something to do with the unfair business practices of MS.Open source can easily beat MS in terms of Price,Quality and Open ness,and that makes it win in a free market competition.
Yep - its pretty clear that an increasing number of Public Sector agencies Worldwide are going to find that the TCO is significantly lower in using OpenOffice/Linux rather than Windows/Office - the point being that a Linux/OpenOffice combination is sufficiently adequate for their needs - that's not to imply that it has all the bells and whistles of an Office 2003 et al, rather, simply that's it's adequate enough - and of course improving all the time.......... watch 2004 unfold on Linux Today
Originally posted by XavierP Isn't Israel's decision more to do with the fact that MS Office stopped supporting Hebrew as they didn't think there was a demand for it? But Open Office and other open source projects did?
Whatever the reason - woo yay Israel.
Actually, Office supports Hebrew just fine, but I have a hell of a time getting OO to. :-(