LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2010, 02:15 AM   #1
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Angry A new pathetic feature of Google for displaying results


Few days back I noticed that the search results have a magnifying glass shaped icon with them. Accidental clicks on the "white space" results in a new image showing the contents of the page in the "tiniest" font which is simply unreadable !! I find it irritating and useless, when we can't read the font then what's the use of showing that image ?? And it doesn't go off until you again click on some white space !

Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 02-16-2015 at 11:57 PM.
 
Old 11-16-2010, 03:11 AM   #2
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
I always have Javascript turned off when I'm searching Google. There's a FF add-on called SearchPreview that basically provides the same functionality as what Google is doing now, only it's a lot less annoying. I also use a Firefox extension called GoogleSharing which *supposedly* anonymizes your searches behind a proxy server.

Actually, I didn't even know Google had added this feature until I happened upon this thread!

Here's what my Google results page(s) look like, BTW. Dark theme is optional.
 
Old 11-16-2010, 03:20 AM   #3
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
and I just turned off Javascript and now those images do not get displayed but Google used to show the relevant search statements while typing in the bar, that too has gone now

Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 12-03-2010 at 12:53 AM. Reason: removed offtopic comment
 
Old 11-16-2010, 04:21 AM   #4
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
and with Javascript disabled I can't even "Look Inside" the Amazon books I had to enable it again !
 
Old 11-16-2010, 06:10 AM   #5
devnull10
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: Lancashire
Distribution: Slackware Stable
Posts: 572

Rep: Reputation: 120Reputation: 120
I think web 2.0 and more and more websites using AJAX then it is becoming increasingly difficult to use the internet with Javascript disabled.
 
Old 11-16-2010, 09:38 AM   #6
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
I hate this new feature. I didn't like 'Instant Search' either, but at least you can turn that off.

Google made it's reputation from being simple, quick and effective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_creep
 
Old 12-03-2010, 12:52 AM   #7
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Angry New nonsense

I have observed for past few days, Google does not display complete results untill I click the search button 3 or 4 times

See the screenshot attached!

Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 02-16-2015 at 11:57 PM.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 03:20 AM   #8
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 116Reputation: 116
I always use noscript in Firefox, then I enable scripts only as needed. I also use privoxy, and it strips a lot of scripts out before the web page ever reaches the browser.

The downside to this is that browsing can be very annoying; a site doesn't work right so I have to enable script after script until it does. Sometimes (often) I just decide I don't need to see that site.

The upside is that browsing is no longer annoying, with those flashing ads and mystery popups, and I NEVER have "surprise" download packages thrust at me, and audio on websites doesn't come on and interfere with the music I'm playing, and my computers and browsers never get infected, and I have cookies under total control.

Hmmm...I guess this just says that these days browsing is annoying, and you have to "pick your poison". Me, I opt for security and privacy, and choose to deal with the annoyances that come with that.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 08:25 AM   #9
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
I don't really find it annoying.

Anyway, I remember I tried NoScript because everyone praised it so much, but I found that the internet is pretty worthless without JavaScript, so I removed NoScript.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 08:32 AM   #10
jschiwal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
I don't really find it annoying.

Anyway, I remember I tried NoScript because everyone praised it so much, but I found that the internet is pretty worthless without JavaScript, so I removed NoScript.
Noscript provides other protections as well. e.g. cross site scripting, attacks on routers. Even if you enable scripting globally.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 12:36 PM   #11
resetreset
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Cyberspace
Distribution: Dynebolic, Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,340

Rep: Reputation: 62
I always, as a fledgling Javascript programmer, thought this feature was amazing myself, Google just showing off what they can do - since they've written a browser, how about utilising its rendering engine, and guess what, do it to give their SEARCH function a new feature - never would have even *occurred* to me, let alone implement it. But, as I see from this thread, it maybe hasn't gone down too well with everyone. Oh well.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 12:40 PM   #12
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by resetreset View Post
I always, as a fledgling Javascript programmer, thought this feature was amazing myself, Google just showing off what they can do - since they've written a browser, how about utilising its rendering engine, and guess what, do it to give their SEARCH function a new feature - never would have even *occurred* to me, let alone implement it.
That sentence was a PITA to read lol.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 07:21 PM   #13
AnanthaP
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 952

Rep: Reputation: 217Reputation: 217Reputation: 217
Magnifying glass is a standard "Zoom" icon used to drill down etc. I think what the OP's crib was the tiny useless font.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 11:33 PM   #14
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnanthaP View Post
Magnifying glass is a standard "Zoom" icon used to drill down etc. I think what the OP's crib was the tiny useless font.
Font was not the only problem I cribbed about! I don't want this feature and there is no way to turn it off ???? Accidental clicking on white spaces opens up these small windows, then again I have click somewhere else to get rid of them!!

Having new experimental features in Google is not the problem but levying them on people IS.
 
Old 12-03-2010, 11:52 PM   #15
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
NoScript is pretty much essential for a peaceful and uncluttered (and safer) browsing experience. The Shift+Ctrl+\ hotkey to enable JavaScript on first level domains makes it more convenient. But some sites are still not adequately functional then; when first level domains can run JS they find more JS to run. Is there a hot key way to enable those too?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google: getting 125000 results altogether. stf92 General 4 03-22-2010 07:28 AM
PHP5 on Apache 2.2/Ubuntu 8.10 not displaying results in browser muzzavitch Linux - Server 1 12-17-2008 06:10 AM
smbstatus - displaying results jahjr Linux - Networking 2 07-25-2006 01:57 PM
Format Google results fiomba General 8 11-21-2004 04:19 AM
Google search feature Mik LQ Suggestions & Feedback 4 03-07-2003 01:52 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration