LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2007, 10:13 AM   #1
odaeng78
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Seoul, Korea
Distribution: Fedora 6
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Smile 6CDs, no alphabetical ordered RPMs..


How come the RPMs are not placed in alphabetical order throughout CDs 2~6 ???

For example, eclipse-related RPMs are dispersed in several CDs.

Wouldn't it be better to have RPMs in CDs in such a way I mentioned above, or is there any specific or interesting reason behind it?
 
Old 05-24-2007, 12:08 PM   #2
jens
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Debian, Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 1,239

Rep: Reputation: 178Reputation: 178
They're placed in order of needfulness. Not everyone likes downloading 6 CDs.
Doing it alphabetically would be a mess during installation.
No one likes swapping CDs every 30 seconds

Last edited by jens; 05-24-2007 at 12:11 PM.
 
Old 05-24-2007, 08:21 PM   #3
Junior Hacker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: North America
Distribution: Debian testing Mandriva Ubuntu
Posts: 2,687

Rep: Reputation: 59
Eclipse is actually a smaller package, but it needs other packages called "dependencies", in order to function. These "dependencies" are sometimes required by other types of software and may already be installed if they were a dependency for something else you installed. But because they were not installed prior to eclipse, they now need to be installed. They are not necessarily a 'eclipse-specific' package, rather a separate type of software used by many applications (common files in Windows).
If you would rather have all these dependencies grouped up and installed with any application that requires them every time you install a different application, install Windows. Then you can have things like Adobe reader 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 all installed at the same time when only one version is required to display .pdf documents. Linux does not install multiple versions of the same dependency. That's the difference, and reason, packages "seem", to not be in order.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gnome-Commander alphabetical sorting Blyiss Linux - Software 2 02-21-2007 12:28 PM
Arranging Files In Alphabetical order swatward Linux - General 4 12-11-2006 09:14 PM
Alphabetical sort wierdness SuperNull Linux - General 2 11-18-2005 01:21 AM
Just ordered my first server! =) nr5 Linux - Software 14 12-28-2004 09:23 PM
Alphabetical Listing of Text trihai44100 Linux - Software 1 03-13-2004 12:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration