DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hi
when i download DVD image in windows ,always md5 of images are incorrect.
what is problem? windows file system? windows OS ? Download manager? iso image? ......
thanks for your help
Last edited by tolstoyinlove; 03-09-2008 at 11:37 AM.
Large images are prone to corruption during downloading. Why dont you try purchasing DVDs?
Or else download the images on some box with a faster connection.
The FAT filesystem can't handle files larger then 4 GB. If you're on Win 2000, ME or older, you're on FAT. NT and XP (and Vi$ta) use NTFS that can handle >4 GB files.
You can also try using jigdo for Windows which allows you to switch mirrors on the fly if your looking for the fastest one, allows you to shut down at any time and resume at a later date, and checks the final md5sum etc. to make sure it's good. If you have an old DVD, some of the packages may be used from it to avoid downloading them if they are required by the template.
Torrent downloads are also checked when the download is complete to make sure it is good, if you get a "successful", it's good.
Was the file size correct and just the md5 wrong? Or was the file size also wrong.
Every time I tried to download a dvd .iso file to windows by ftp or http the final size was always way low. I only got it right when I used bit torrent instead of ftp or http.
Was the file size correct and just the md5 wrong? Or was the file size also wrong.
Every time I tried to download a dvd .iso file to windows by ftp or http the final size was always way low. I only got it right when I used bit torrent instead of ftp or http.
And I am wondering if with downloading it with knoppix live cd would work, linux is more powerful than windows.
you can use knoppix on one machine, and mount a windows share and use knoppix to copy it to windows
I wonder if knoppix live cd would have enough RAM for that operation
Reasons for failed downloads include
- using Internet Explorer, which has been known to produce corruption in larger isos; use firefox instead
- corrupt RAM; recurrent failing md5sums are often an indication of bad RAM - use memtest to check your RAM
- limited file system (as pointed out by Dutch Master)
Anyway, if you seem to be fine with downloading a whole DVD, why not download just the first cd or the netinstall disk? Downloading the DVD means you waste 4GB with each download.
Of course, if your problems are hardware related, this is not a proper solution as the problem is bound to resurface sooner or later.
I have also seen defective windows md5 hashing programs that gave bad results all the time (no clue why), when a different program was used to check the md5 it showed as correct, and when the image was burned it worked just fine.. Weird experience really..
Either way I would just download the netinstall.iso (150 MB) it's faster and easier than downloading a huge outdated DVD iso.. imho
I have also seen defective windows md5 hashing programs that gave bad results all the time (no clue why), when a different program was used to check the md5 it showed as correct, and when the image was burned it worked just fine.. Weird experience really..
a md5 is a md5
use win32 totalcmmder to check it
F3, F4
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.