The thing is that I saw just "a few" sources:
Code:
Release Package (size)
unstable nvidia-kernel-common 1.0.4496-2 (2.5k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module common files
testing nvidia-kernel-common 1.0.4496-1 (2.4k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module common files
experimental nvidia-glx-dev 1.0.4496-3 (81k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver development files
testing nvidia-glx-dev 1.0.4496-2 (80.1k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver development files
unstable nvidia-glx-dev 1.0.4496-2.1 (81.5k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver development files
stable nvidia-glx-src 1.0.2880-3 (10.2k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
experimental nvidia-kernel-source 1.0.4496-3 (689k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module source
unstable nvidia-glx-src 1.0.4349-1 (12.3k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
testing nvidia-glx-src 1.0.4349-1 (12.3k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
testing nvidia-kernel-source 1.0.4496-2 (687.8k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module source
unstable nvidia-kernel-source 1.0.4496-2.1 (690.5k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module source
stable nvidia-kernel-src 1.0.2880-1 (9.8k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module
testing nvidia-kernel-src 1.0.4349-3 (26.3k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module
unstable nvidia-kernel-src 1.0.4349-3 (26.3k)
NVIDIA binary kernel module
experimental nvidia-glx 1.0.4496-3 (2238k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
unstable nvidia-glx 1.0.4496-2.1 (2237.3k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
testing nvidia-glx 1.0.4496-2 (2237.2k)
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
As I am running testing which one is the best?
What's the difference?
How about the glx module?Don't I need it?If so, why is it optional?