DamnSmallLinuxThis forum is for the discussion of DamnSmallLinux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Agreed. I have a Pentium II with similar specs. It runs great on DSL frugal. In fact, DSL is the only Linux distro I've managed to get running on the computer.
Agreed. I have a Pentium II with similar specs. It runs great on DSL frugal. In fact, DSL is the only Linux distro I've managed to get running on the computer.
I couldn't get it to work on my Pentium II with 96 megs of RAM. Of course, that might have something to do with some incompatible component and nothing to do with the processor or the amount of RAM. But, Puppy does have more memory-intensive applications built-in like (if my memory is correct) Abiword. I like to use Puppy as a lightweight desktop distro on a fairly new (or at least newish) computer. It's less bloated than the big boys like Ubuntu, but more bloated than DSL.
DSL is a really specialized distro to create the smallest memory footprint possible and still function as a near-full-featured GUI desktop. On something like a Pentium II with 96 megs of RAM, I really think Puppy would be too slow.
Luckily, since they're both LiveCDs, you can try them out before you commit. See which one works better for you on your hardware.
Another twist that you can consider: There is a pretty big community of PuppyLinux modders, and lots of PuppyLinux derivatives you can try out. Some are bigger than the default version of Puppy (and therefore not much use for your project), but others are smaller and more streamlined. You could try some of them out and see if one suits your needs.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.