2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2013. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 4th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Video Media Player Application of the Year
I congratulate the vlc developers for vlc's super majority win. However, I have a AVI video that will not play in vlc but will play in mplayer. And, I have all the vlc codecs that might have possibly worked. Mplayer is the only backend player that I can play it in, and I also tried it in Totem, mplayer2, and Dragon Player with gstreamer.
Last edited by cowlitzron; 02-05-2014 at 12:39 AM.
Reason: correct misspellings
I looked at the change log and it looks like more regressions than improvements. Thanks but no thanks
Interesting. I have used mplayer, mplayer2, and now mpv, in their raw state, sans any gui front ends. Mpv has been solid for me and I have yet to have it lock up and need to be killed. Cannot say the same for the other 2. But then I've also only been using mpv for a few months. Time will tell.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotfw
Interesting. I have used mplayer, mplayer2, and now mpv, in their raw state, sans any gui front ends. Mpv has been solid for me and I have yet to have it lock up and need to be killed. Cannot say the same for the other 2. But then I've also only been using mpv for a few months. Time will tell.
mplayer doesn't usually lock up for me.
Quote:
Removal of the internal GUI, MEncoder, OSD menu
needless removal of useful features
Quote:
Better pause handling (do not unpause on a command)
Better MKV support (such as ordered chapters)
vo_vdpau improvements
Precise seeking support
Improvements in audio/video sync handling
Legitimate improvments I guess
Quote:
No embedded copy of ffmpeg and other libraries
?
Quote:
Native OpenGL backend for OSX
General OSX improvements
Not helpful for non OSX users
Quote:
Cleaned up terminal output
I actually like the verbosity of mplayer
Quote:
Gapless audio support (--gapless-audio)
Improved responsiveness on user input
Support for modifier keys (alt, shift, ctrl) in input.conf
OSS4 volume control
More correct color reproduction (color matrix generation)
Use libass for subtitle rendering by default (better quality)
Improvements when playing multiple files (--fixed-vo)
Screenshot improvements (instant screenshots without 1-frame delay, allow taking screenshots even with hardware decoding)
Not important (for me atleast)
Quote:
Generally preferring ffmpeg/libav over internal demuxers and decoders
There are actually files that mplayer will play for me that ffmpeg/libav will not handle
Quote:
Removal of lots of unneeded code to encourage developer activity (less obscure scary zombie code that kills any desire for hacking the codebase)
Removal of dust and dead bodies (code-wise), such as kernel drivers for decades old hardware
Removal of support for dead platforms
I have a bunch of old hardware so this can only be a down side for me. I hate it when support for old
stuff is stripped. Doesn't gain much
Quote:
Generally improved MS Windows support (dealing with unicode filenames, improved --vo=direct3d, improved window handling)
Removal of most builtin demuxers, using libavformat instead
Not necessarily a good thing especially for broken files
Quote:
OSX: Cocoa event loop is independent from mplayer's event loop, so user actions like accessing menus and live resizing do not block the playback.
OSX: Apple Remote support.
OSX: Media Keys support.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
I want to thank those who brought up mpv -- I installed it just now and am watching a movie with it. The interface is nice and simple and I think it will be good as a "backup" to VLC especially as VLC seems not to want to appear on both my monitors at once.
I used mplayer2 a while ago until it was removed from the Arch repos. I'll take a look at mpv now
Yes, this is how I came to discover MPV myself. No sure but maybe mplayer2 is now dead? Will be curious to see if it's still in the polls next year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273
I want to thank those who brought up mpv -- I installed it just now and am watching a movie with it. The interface is nice and simple and I think it will be good as a "backup" to VLC especially as VLC seems not to want to appear on both my monitors at once.
You're welcome. Glad it's working out for you.
One of the things I dislike about VLC is it's gui, and that I have to pull in all those qt libraries just for that _one_ app.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty
Yeah VLC has a heavy GUI
I'm not keen on it at all but it gets the job done. For example I'm ripping my DVD collection to HDD and VLC just plays the .iso's and nothing else seems to want to. However, VLC will only open on one of my monitors at a time.
I'm not keen on it at all but it gets the job done. For example I'm ripping my DVD collection to HDD and VLC just plays the .iso's and nothing else seems to want to. However, VLC will only open on one of my monitors at a time.
I'm not clear on what you mean by only one monitor at a time.
I can get two different instances on two different monitors with no problems. (except that the sound clashes)
It may be down to the preferences that have been set on your installation.
Or are you trying to get one instance to span across two monitors?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.