2012 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2012 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2012. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 4th.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
for the pro-Firebird crowd out there... I'm curious about the pros/cons vs. postgresql. If you have a link to another thread or site with that kind of info, I'd be interested. The ones I found during a casual search were several years old and generally didn't lean in favor of Firebird in a side-by-side feature comparison.
MySQL for its amazing performance on huge tables. I believe MariaDB should be the same, so I was going to try moving my dbs to it, since MySQL development road has changed after the Oracle purchase. But I found that, at least on Debian, MariaDB is much bigger than and depends on MySQL packages. So I stayed with MySQL at least during the Wheezy release.
Jeeze!! All these one post only votes for Firebird. Why is it every year the Firebird schills crawl out of the woodwork? Nobody I know actually uses it...lol...
Get ready for the new!. Firebird is the most cost effective in the database that a company can have. Open Source, almost zero maintenance, excellent performance and many important resources. Several countries are adopting it. Firebird is the base of applications in our company and we are very pleased.