2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
System Rescue Cd is missing. I use it for recovery system admin and other things like learning about a computers hardware to aide in my installation of GNU/Linux.
Couldn't agree more with everything that has been said about Sidux. Been happily using it since end 2007 and it has never let me down. It simply evolves.
I would give antiX the top vote as the overall Live CD that I find most useful.
My reasons:
1. It is small enough to load live within a few minutes even on my slower systems and I can load it into memory on most of them.
2. I can do most of the things with antiX that I do even on larger, full featured desktop systems.
3. AntiX comes with most of the applications that I use.
4. AntiX is fast.
5. AntiX is lean.
6. AntiX is flexible and easy to modify.
I really love sidux, too, and it is one of my three favorite desktop systems, but for a live CD, I find AntiX to be more to my liking.
On powerful laptop systems, I like SimplyMEPIS when I am on the move, but even then, I often opt for AntiX instead.
I do experiment with Puppy from time to time. It is smaller and faster than AntiX. On my old system, when I want to run from memory in live mode, I sometimes opt for Puppy, but mostly if I intend to be using only a Web browser, otherwise I go with AntiX.
Mepis has my vote in this category. While sidux is very nice, it simply can't hold a candle in the live CD realm when compared to Mepis.
With the Mepis CD I can boot up my IBM T60 and have wireless working. Can't do that with the sidux live cd, without downloading the iwlwifi firmware first (or having it on a USB stick or CDrom).
In a pinch, Mepis gets the job done without having to jump through hoops.
Clonezilla LiveCD easily detected the drives and hardware in my Dell Latitude E6500 so I could image the Drive prior to replacing it. What a nice piece of work.
More of a Live Utility than a Live Distro through..
Clonezilla LiveCD easily detected the drives and hardware in my Dell Latitude E6500 so I could image the Drive prior to replacing it. What a nice piece of work.
More of a Live Utility than a Live Distro through..
Thanks so much! I really think that looks awesome.
I have used Knoppix quite a bit as a recovery tool, and recently I have played with mandriva one a bit. Mandriva installed itself quite easily when I told it to, and everything just worked after that, though I did have to add some packages to bring the environment into the shape I needed it to be in.
I haven't tried to install Knoppix.
For historical reasons and based upon more experience with it, I'll say I pick Knoppix.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.