LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.

Notices


View Poll Results: Live Distribution of the Year
KNOPPIX 148 16.57%
PCLinuxOS 32 3.58%
Sabayon 14 1.57%
Damn Small 38 4.26%
Dreamlinux 21 2.35%
Puppy 84 9.41%
Elive 8 0.90%
SLAX 97 10.86%
Fedora Live 35 3.92%
Ubuntu Live 209 23.40%
Mandriva One 34 3.81%
Gentoo Live 10 1.12%
SimplyMEPIS 42 4.70%
sidux 92 10.30%
Wolvix 9 1.01%
dyne:bolic 6 0.67%
Debian Live 14 1.57%
Voters: 893. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-16-2009, 05:58 PM   #46
digitelle
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 57

Rep: Reputation: 16

Musix
 
Old 01-17-2009, 08:42 AM   #47
khronosschoty
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 648
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514
System Rescue Cd is missing. I use it for recovery system admin and other things like learning about a computers hardware to aide in my installation of GNU/Linux.

There Website is: http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page
 
Old 01-17-2009, 12:54 PM   #48
Jathrop
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Puppy Power

I like Puppy for live disc use. It's amazing at picking up hardware and working right out of the "box".
 
Old 01-17-2009, 01:18 PM   #49
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,113
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
Mans best friend, Puppy.
 
Old 01-17-2009, 10:06 PM   #50
custangro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: California
Distribution: Fedora , CentOS , RHEL
Posts: 1,979
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 209Reputation: 209Reputation: 209
No backtrack?
 
Old 01-18-2009, 03:10 AM   #51
k2t0f12d
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Under a rock . . .
Distribution: LFS SVN 20070514; Kubuntu 7.04 `Feisty'
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Um...gNewSense?? >;(
 
Old 01-18-2009, 04:11 PM   #52
Fen-Phen
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Berlin, DE
Distribution: SIDUX
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Sidux

Couldn't agree more with everything that has been said about Sidux. Been happily using it since end 2007 and it has never let me down. It simply evolves.

Regards
Fen-Phen
 
Old 01-19-2009, 10:59 AM   #53
masinick
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Distribution: Debian, antiX, MX Linux
Posts: 636
Blog Entries: 16

Rep: Reputation: 104Reputation: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by anticapitalista View Post
Where is antiX?

Otherwise I'll vote for sidux.

Is there a Debian live?
I would give antiX the top vote as the overall Live CD that I find most useful.

My reasons:

1. It is small enough to load live within a few minutes even on my slower systems and I can load it into memory on most of them.

2. I can do most of the things with antiX that I do even on larger, full featured desktop systems.

3. AntiX comes with most of the applications that I use.

4. AntiX is fast.

5. AntiX is lean.

6. AntiX is flexible and easy to modify.

I really love sidux, too, and it is one of my three favorite desktop systems, but for a live CD, I find AntiX to be more to my liking.

On powerful laptop systems, I like SimplyMEPIS when I am on the move, but even then, I often opt for AntiX instead.

I do experiment with Puppy from time to time. It is smaller and faster than AntiX. On my old system, when I want to run from memory in live mode, I sometimes opt for Puppy, but mostly if I intend to be using only a Web browser, otherwise I go with AntiX.
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:18 PM   #54
antman
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Distribution: Scientific Linux - AntiX - Fedora
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Mepis has my vote in this category. While sidux is very nice, it simply can't hold a candle in the live CD realm when compared to Mepis.

With the Mepis CD I can boot up my IBM T60 and have wireless working. Can't do that with the sidux live cd, without downloading the iwlwifi firmware first (or having it on a USB stick or CDrom).

In a pinch, Mepis gets the job done without having to jump through hoops.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 03:17 PM   #55
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
Another nice Live CD is Clonezilla..

Clonezilla LiveCD easily detected the drives and hardware in my Dell Latitude E6500 so I could image the Drive prior to replacing it. What a nice piece of work.

More of a Live Utility than a Live Distro through..
 
Old 01-21-2009, 04:21 PM   #56
portamenteff
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado
Distribution: lubuntu, fedora, lightning Linux.
Posts: 180
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 36
I like Slax. It's quick and easy.
 
Old 01-22-2009, 10:12 AM   #57
khronosschoty
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 648
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by farslayer

Another nice Live CD is Clonezilla..

Clonezilla LiveCD easily detected the drives and hardware in my Dell Latitude E6500 so I could image the Drive prior to replacing it. What a nice piece of work.

More of a Live Utility than a Live Distro through..
Thanks so much! I really think that looks awesome.
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:59 AM   #58
686plus
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 17
What? No BackTrack!?
 
Old 01-22-2009, 05:12 PM   #59
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 116Reputation: 116
I have used Knoppix quite a bit as a recovery tool, and recently I have played with mandriva one a bit. Mandriva installed itself quite easily when I told it to, and everything just worked after that, though I did have to add some packages to bring the environment into the shape I needed it to be in.

I haven't tried to install Knoppix.

For historical reasons and based upon more experience with it, I'll say I pick Knoppix.
 
Old 01-23-2009, 04:28 PM   #60
rob33n
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Turkey
Distribution: Debian, Windows
Posts: 134

Rep: Reputation: 16
I think result will be Ubuntu or Fedora
 
  


Reply

Tags
backtrack, linux, portable, puppy, security



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Live Distribution of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 69 02-29-2008 09:31 AM
Distribution of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 537 08-27-2007 01:17 PM
Live Distribution of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 164 04-16-2007 11:04 AM
Distribution of the Year jeremy 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 348 06-16-2006 09:52 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration