2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
The MC receiving the focus it should to, I personally do in either said MC or in konqueror, all others lacking the sheer number of protocols supported by the konqueror and the speed+stability of MC.
Despite of above written, i voted for krusader.
1. Konqueror being soon obsolete by dolphin (kde4?)
2. MC being omnipresent
3. ever tried to swiftly free couple GB on a multy 100GB system ;-)? the graphical space oversight of krusader just rocks above all (in pie chart mode).
4. Most users ever, used a 2 plane FM, so are familiar to krusader by default
Thunar. it has a good balance between features and maneuver. i miss the tabs in the new Nautilus but it simply it stands in the user's way (eg: expanding some folders when one tries to select others, issues with changing folder tree owners).
i excluded the KDE ones, although i think Dolphin and Krusader are great.