LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices



Poll: Security App of the Year
Poll Options
Security App of the Year

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

nmap
snort
Nessus
chkrootkit
Tripwire
tcpdump
kismet
fwBuilder
ClamAv
Firestarter
Bastille
SELinux

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2006, 12:23 PM   #16
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,005
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903

Quote:
Originally Posted by anticapitalista
I don't use apache, samba and I never forward emails.
But you asked your question "Who needs AV on Linux?" as if
there was no need at all ... the fact that you believe you don't
is a whole different story; as far as I'm concerned your not
afraid enough.


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 02-01-2006, 05:33 AM   #17
anticapitalista
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, i3, wmii, fluxbox, icewm and jwm.
Posts: 305

Rep: Reputation: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinkster
But you asked your question "Who needs AV on Linux?" as if
there was no need at all ... the fact that you believe you don't
is a whole different story; as far as I'm concerned your not
afraid enough.


Cheers,
Tink
My first post "who needs av anyway?" was tongue-in-cheek, the second one as a reply to KimVette's excellent post and why I don't need it.


Last edited by anticapitalista; 02-01-2006 at 05:34 AM.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 08:49 AM   #18
riskable
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
This was a tough one! I'm a security professional so I use quite a number of these tools on a daily basis...

I chose snort because it is being used and integrated into a LOT of 3rd party products (mostly security appliances) via its "inline" mode. These cheap devices are selling well and will end up making Linux the edge security OS (device) of choice for enterprises and small businesses alike. This is an area previously dominated by proprietary players like Cisco and Check Point.

Of course, a lot of these appliances also use ClamAV, but it's primary purpose is to protect Windows machines so no vote =).

nmap and Nessus are essential tools for me, but nmap hasn't changed much over the course of the year and Nessus announced that they're moving away from the GPL. IMHO, that creates a hole in the FOSS security community that I KNOW there's geeks just dying to fill. It is one of those areas that FOSS excels at and in almost all cases, the FOSS tools are superior to their commercial counterparts.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 08:25 PM   #19
kassle
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Linux From Scratch falling in love with Slackware
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
duh ... how to judge this things
since it's complement each other

anyway ... i choose snort, because
it give more logs (the disk space eater)
than another

 
Old 02-01-2006, 08:48 PM   #20
stupendo44
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use KMyFirewall, which sets up iptables.
 
Old 02-02-2006, 10:49 AM   #21
jaboua
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
It's a hard choice, but I'll put nmap as #1. JohnTheRipper makes a good #2.
 
Old 02-02-2006, 10:55 AM   #22
n3wb13
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: BG
Distribution: Slackware 10.1 (At Home), FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE (At Work) Both with fluxbox
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
nmap, t0r, p0f
 
Old 02-04-2006, 10:10 AM   #23
segin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
nmap cause it just fork()ing works.
 
Old 02-04-2006, 04:14 PM   #24
anti.corp
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576

Rep: Reputation: 30
Firestarter. Easy to install (with a little help from Dead parrot ). And the wizard caught all those more or less odd services I got running.
 
Old 02-07-2006, 12:52 PM   #25
Thetargos
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico City
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu & Mint
Posts: 1,679

Rep: Reputation: 45
My vote goes to Firewall Builder. I don't care it's based on KDE's QT toolkit, it simply rocks! You can not only configure your Linux firewall as strong as you want, but you can also do it for *BSD, MacOS, and even Windows®, very good application!
 
Old 02-10-2006, 03:26 PM   #26
Fireball7
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Ubuntu 6.06
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
WHAT?!?!?!?? No Paketto Keiretsu? How could they?

http://www.doxpara.com/paketto/

Seriously.

(And btw, nmap out of what they have, then snort (though I use airsnort)).
 
Old 02-12-2006, 03:08 PM   #27
SkyEye
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Sri Lanka
Distribution: Fedora (workstations), CentOS (servers), Arch, Mint, Ubuntu, and a few more.
Posts: 441

Rep: Reputation: 40
Really, these things can't be compared farely.

Nobody should have a matter with nmap. Even with the controvcy of closing the source Nessus still is a great application (again I do not agree with closing its source).

One thing which might not be highlighted much but might have a great future is SELinux. My guess is it can be the norm in Linux security with growing implementation. Althought it changes the Linux security model in to something I never knew, it looks really promising.
 
Old 02-16-2006, 03:31 AM   #28
danex50
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
nmap. But AppArmor should have it's place in this list.
 
Old 02-16-2006, 09:13 AM   #29
glebovitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
security apps

While all of these apps serve different purposes, SELinux has done the most for me. Labeling and kernel based policy enforcement does a great job of partitioning security. I got tired of running "jails" for each service.
 
Old 02-16-2006, 10:02 AM   #30
Mizzou_Engineer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Distribution: Gentoo 2007.0 x86 & amd64
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Ethereal. It is very important if you have any sort of a LAN or are connected to the Internet.
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Award: Security app of the year KayJay LQ Suggestions & Feedback 1 01-29-2003 11:04 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration