Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader
(Post 5747528)
ESR stands just for Extended Support Release, nothing magic here, you know... ;)
I agree that may make sense to go ESR in a stable release, BUT the current stay on top of many other included software, anyways...
If we want really those old good versions, maybe we should NOT jump always on the latest X.org, consequently breaking every time the AMD drivers, BTW... :D
|
see ESR more as a LTS, and the other one, firefox current, as a developer snapshot. No magic here. ;)
if you put a non LTS into current, and than want to stabilize for release, you might what to go down with the version number, or ship an unstable package with Slackware, or adopt to the release cycle of the whole distribution to the release cycle from FF.
So this is a different situation to your comparison with xorg, no magic here, just details, BTW ... :D
also, and this is why i prefer ESR, ff-current breaks plugins from time to time, and I know a lot of users that have changed because of this to chrome.
Mozilla made a huge mistake by making their current branch to the 'default' one, and the ESR to only those who know about it.
It should have been precise vice versa, than firefox would not have that big loss on users, which hey have.
Mozilla made its users to beta testers, and frustrated a lot of plugin authors with their unstable and unpredictable development plans. The shrinking user numbers are the result.
|