LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2020, 09:52 AM   #5491
resolver
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2020
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Please remove rust and Firefox. The rust team has poor security hygiene. They believe it's OK to download untrusted binaries in order to compile their compiler. They don't even ask the user if that is acceptable. Because Firefox is built on rust, it has to go as well.
 
Old 09-01-2020, 10:34 AM   #5492
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by resolver View Post
Please remove rust and Firefox. The rust team has poor security hygiene. They believe it's OK to download untrusted binaries in order to compile their compiler. They don't even ask the user if that is acceptable. Because Firefox is built on rust, it has to go as well.
Good luck on getting this to happen. Not everyone shares your misguided sense of security (as has been heavily discussed in your other thread).
 
Old 09-01-2020, 11:23 AM   #5493
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by resolver View Post
Please remove rust and Firefox. The rust team has poor security hygiene. They believe it's OK to download untrusted binaries in order to compile their compiler. They don't even ask the user if that is acceptable. Because Firefox is built on rust, it has to go as well.
Normal users do not have to compile rust from sources, they use their distro's packages. A distro packager will make all the difficult decisions on behalf of the software's end-users. This is not a trivial task. Not just for rust but also for other pieces of software.

IF you think you are qualified to build your own packages - then the rule number one is that you read the documentation about what you are supposed to do and what you can expect.

As I told you in your other ridiculous topic, you could have simply read the docs and noticed that the script you wanted to use needs to download a bootstrap compiler. If you want to use an already installed rust compiler, that is entirely possible and does not require a download of a bootstrap compiler. You can tell the script about that.
You are confusing security with ignorance.
 
9 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2020, 02:04 PM   #5494
tramtrist
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2018
Location: Cincinnati USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 535

Rep: Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327
htop 3.0
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/blob/master/ChangeLog
 
Old 09-01-2020, 03:28 PM   #5495
drgibbon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2014
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 1,221

Rep: Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by tramtrist View Post
Already in:
Quote:
Sat Aug 29 17:47:04 UTC 2020
ap/htop-3.0.0-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded.
 
Old 09-01-2020, 04:43 PM   #5496
tramtrist
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2018
Location: Cincinnati USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 535

Rep: Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327
ah.. missed it. Thanks drgibbon
 
Old 09-02-2020, 09:39 PM   #5497
USUARIONUEVO
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,335

Rep: Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930
The latest update for setuptools, again broken lib path


for x64 goes under /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64


that cause extra modules depending of setuptool fail to build.
 
Old 09-02-2020, 11:30 PM   #5498
montagdude
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2016
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,011

Rep: Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619Reputation: 1619
Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO View Post
The latest update for setuptools, again broken lib path


for x64 goes under /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64


that cause extra modules depending of setuptool fail to build.
I'm also having this issue. A bunch of python stuff is broken. In one package (networkx):
Code:
    from pkg_resources import parse_version
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'
And then when I tried to reinstall networkx from SBo:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 16, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
 
Old 09-03-2020, 11:58 AM   #5499
Thom1b
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 484

Rep: Reputation: 337Reputation: 337Reputation: 337Reputation: 337
gnupg2 2.2.23 is released with security fix.

Quote:
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
version 2.2.23. This version fixes a *critical security bug* in
versions 2.2.21 and 2.2.22.
(…)
Importing an OpenPGP key having a preference list for AEAD algorithms
will lead to an array overflow and thus often to a crash or other
undefined behaviour.

Importing an arbitrary key can often easily be triggered by an attacker
and thus triggering this bug. Exploiting the bug aside from crashes is
not trivial but likely possible for a dedicated attacker. The major
hurdle for an attacker is that only every second byte is under their
control with every first byte having a fixed value of 0x04.

Software distribution verification should not be affected by this bug
because such a system uses a curated list of keys.

A CVE-id has not yet been assigned. We track this bug at
https://dev.gnupg.org/T5050
 
Old 09-03-2020, 03:16 PM   #5500
biker_rat
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 369

Rep: Reputation: 220Reputation: 220Reputation: 220
mesa is 20.1.7 now
 
Old 09-03-2020, 04:09 PM   #5501
USUARIONUEVO
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,335

Rep: Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930
setuptools are fixen today.

thanks!
 
Old 09-03-2020, 07:39 PM   #5502
anon070
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2016
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Are suggestions taken for programs which may be no longer be needed? Like rcs (revision control system)?
 
Old 09-04-2020, 01:04 AM   #5503
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by PragmaticCypher View Post
Are suggestions taken for programs which may be no longer be needed? Like rcs (revision control system)?
I use it every day.
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-04-2020, 01:58 AM   #5504
drgibbon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2014
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 1,221

Rep: Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by PragmaticCypher View Post
Are suggestions taken for programs which may be no longer be needed? Like rcs (revision control system)?
You can't win this one, pick a random/obscure/ancient program, and someone will pop up defending it
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-04-2020, 06:45 AM   #5505
saxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Nova Gorica, Salvador
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,213

Rep: Reputation: 297Reputation: 297Reputation: 297
gtk+-3.24.23
https://download.gnome.org/sources/g...3.24.23.tar.xz

Would be nice if we could get glib 2.66.x series and friends into current, they should arrive at the end of this month.
Most probably will be just a simple matter of upgradepkg on the once we have.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration