SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,099
Rep:
PulseAudio-12.1
The change log,
Quote:
Hi all,
Some regressions slipped into the 12.0 release, so here comes 12.1 that
tries to make things better:
* Fixed a crash when switching to the A2DP bluetooth profile
* Fixed the plugin search path in module-ladspa-sink
* Fixed file permissions for the pipes created by module-pipe-sink and
module-pipe-source
There are some "lazy" doinst.sh that handle the .new files in bulk. For example dovecot. So I modified the proposed patch from post #1646. It wont check if the new file is listed in doinst.sh, exclude some important files and remove also the .orig files.
--- removepkg.8.orig 2018-06-19 19:28:00.000000000 -0400
+++ removepkg.8 2018-07-14 18:37:18.442000000 -0400
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
[
.B \--warn
]
+[
+.B \--purge
+]
.BI packagename
.SH DESCRIPTION
.B removepkg
@@ -94,6 +97,11 @@
.B \--warn packagename
Generate a report to the standard output about which files and directories
would be removed, but does not actually remove the package.
+.TP
+.B \--purge
+Remove the files coresponding to the .new files in the package. These files are usually handled by
+.B doinst.sh
+upon install. For example if the package contains /etc/foo.conf.new then /etc/foo.conf and /etc/foo.conf.orig will be removed.
.SH " "
It's possible to remove a package from a filesystem
other than / by supplying
If this patch is accepted I think it would be nice to modify slackpkg so that "slackpkg clean-system" runs "removepkg --purge"
There are some "lazy" doinst.sh that handle the .new files in bulk. For example dovecot. So I modified the proposed patch from post #1646. It wont check if the new file is listed in doinst.sh, exclude some important files and remove also the .orig files.
--- removepkg.8.orig 2018-06-19 19:28:00.000000000 -0400
+++ removepkg.8 2018-07-14 18:37:18.442000000 -0400
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
[
.B \--warn
]
+[
+.B \--purge
+]
.BI packagename
.SH DESCRIPTION
.B removepkg
@@ -94,6 +97,11 @@
.B \--warn packagename
Generate a report to the standard output about which files and directories
would be removed, but does not actually remove the package.
+.TP
+.B \--purge
+Remove the files coresponding to the .new files in the package. These files are usually handled by
+.B doinst.sh
+upon install. For example if the package contains /etc/foo.conf.new then /etc/foo.conf and /etc/foo.conf.orig will be removed.
.SH " "
It's possible to remove a package from a filesystem
other than / by supplying
If this patch is accepted I think it would be nice to modify slackpkg so that "slackpkg clean-system" runs "removepkg --purge"
I can't comment on whether the patch will be accepted, but I can say that slackpkg will not have such modifications. At *best* it would accept a "slackpkg clean-system --purge" option to do that, but removing config files upon package removal would not be desirable for me.
I can't comment on whether the patch will be accepted, but I can say that slackpkg will not have such modifications. At *best* it would accept a "slackpkg clean-system --purge" option to do that, but removing config files upon package removal would not be desirable for me.
Or me, or many. There is many situations where it is not desirable. One could write a script to zcat the slackpkg that finds config files to rm. It should be a user intervention in any case.
I'm not quite sure where to post this, but I just wanted to report that updating xf86-video-ati from 18.0.1 to 20180711_f533b1f6 broke my multi-monitor setup. I use xrandr to set up my screens from a .xinitrc. I posted a bug report about this here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107253 (I've never posted a bug report before).
My setup includes an onboard Intel graphics card and a Radeon R7 360 card with a monitor attached to each.
I also tried out their latest git commit (16 July 2018, d9a139bc...), but it had the same problem. 18.0.1 works well though!
I'm not quite sure where to post this, but I just wanted to report that updating xf86-video-ati from 18.0.1 to 20180711_f533b1f6 broke my multi-monitor setup. I use xrandr to set up my screens from a .xinitrc. I posted a bug report about this here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107253 (I've never posted a bug report before).
My setup includes an onboard Intel graphics card and a Radeon R7 360 card with a monitor attached to each.
I also tried out their latest git commit (16 July 2018, d9a139bc...), but it had the same problem. 18.0.1 works well though!
Did you tried to use the open-source AMDGPU instead of RADEON driver?
A Sea Islands graphics card like yours is also pretty well supported by the open-source AMDGPU, which is without argue with higher performances.
You need only some kernel parameters for switching the graphics stack
Code:
radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1
At my job, happens to have an entire office equipped with R7 260 (8 computers), and they works perfectly with the AMDGPU. True, under SLED, but still...
Last edited by Darth Vader; 07-17-2018 at 01:14 AM.
Did you tried to use the open-source AMDGPU instead of RADEON driver?
A Sea Islands graphics card like yours is also pretty well supported by the open-source AMDGPU, which is without argue with higher performances.
Cool! I was not aware of the existence of amdgpu - I'll look into it.
I'm not quite sure where to post this, but I just wanted to report that updating xf86-video-ati from 18.0.1 to 20180711_f533b1f6 broke my multi-monitor setup. I use xrandr to set up my screens from a .xinitrc. I posted a bug report about this here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107253 (I've never posted a bug report before).
My setup includes an onboard Intel graphics card and a Radeon R7 360 card with a monitor attached to each.
I also tried out their latest git commit (16 July 2018, d9a139bc...), but it had the same problem. 18.0.1 works well though!
You just received a response and your bug report was marked as solved by no one other than Michel Dänzer
Quote:
Michel Dänzer 2018-07-17 08:00:19 UTC
Until this is fixed in xf86-video-intel, it should work with the modesetting driver instead.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 100086 ***
Apparently, your issue is really on xf86-video-intel which does not play well with the updated xf86-video-ati in some particular cases.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 07-17-2018 at 05:16 AM.
Apparently, your issue is really on xf86-video-intel which does not play well with the updated xf86-video-ati in some particular cases.
Yep, that's what they said. But I don't really care *which* driver is at fault here - the problem only happened when I updated xf86-video-ati (full details in my bug report), so I'm suggesting that maybe slackware-current might want to stick with 18.0.1 until they get both drivers working properly. Just my two cents anyway.
Last edited by casualfred; 07-17-2018 at 09:40 PM.
Reason: mention where the full details can be found
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.