Linus shoots from the hip, and calls a spade a spade...
Not strictly a Slackware matter, but I wanted to share this in my own group of gearheads and not the naive masses.
It looks like mACROsFOT is getting a little desperate again. Their standard M.O. of "Extend, Embrace, Exterminate" is, um... lol. Well, it looks like the boiz over at Redhat are at it again, suckin' up to Redmond. But Linus gave them a good admonishing a couple of days ago for it - You go girl! https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/21/228 :hattip: Enjoy :) . |
The linked page doesn't seem to want to load for me, but I suspect it's the same topic as this arstechnica article I've just read:
http://arstechnica.com/information-t...oat-microsoft/ |
This is already the third thread about this topic, see here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...nt-4175451548/ http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...nt-4175451575/ |
Quote:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1152077...58413061926434 Enjoy : . |
And hence the reason why the whole UEFI crap is...crap and a Microshit attempt at control of *everything*, again. The *only* time anything 'Microshaft' should be trusted, is when it's not within 300 frigging miles of whatever it is one is working on. Kick their sellout asses Linus!
|
Macroshaft loves trying to bone Linux any chance it gets.
I wish Linus would yank Linux away from Red Hat and forbid them to release, work on, or contribute anything to Linux anymore. I won't bring up why, again, but it involves a certain "developer" who shall be known as "He Who Shall Not Be Named". Red Hat is evil... and I wouldn't be surprised if they've been in bed getting it on dirty and funky with Gates and Balmer before. |
Quote:
|
Well, the thing is if Microsoft is the key holder for Secure Boot, then they hold all the keys to the kingdom. They are the gatekeepers, and they say who is who, what is what, and this is that.
|
Quote:
|
Any motherboard/x86(_64) machine that is Windows 8 Logo certified must have the abilities to disable Secure Boot and to enable the user to add and remove keys at his own will, so Microsoft is far from being the gatekeeper.
|
Quote:
I can't see how Secure Boot doesn't either result in less Linux adoption, or giving a lot more control over Linux to Microsoft... that's why I care. |
"Wer in manchen Situationen nicht den Verstand verliert, der hat wahrscheinlich gar keinen." (Lessing)
Meaning: if you don't lose your mind in certain situations, then probably you don't have a mind. So +1 for Linus. |
Quote:
Indeed. If a motherboard "BIOS" does not have the ability to disable Secure Boot and add/remove keys then the people to complain to (loudly and long) is the motherboard manufacturers. While this whole debacle may have been precipitated by Microsoft, they are not the only contributory player here. |
Quote:
"HR Block Tax Cut " it is wrote in MS visual studio and calls IE by name the move to ie7 killed it for a bit seeing as ie7 was also windows explorer7 . and a few "dumb" games that are directX personally i would love to see MS have to get singed keys from RedHat Debian Slackware FreeBSD -- and so on to get windows 7,8,9,???? to run Put the shoe on the other foot |
Quote:
Technology is probably going to progress to the point where we'll have to authenticate with our DNA from touching the power button before we can boot our computers... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM. |