LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2013, 01:37 PM   #1
tallship
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On the Beaches of Super Sunny Southern San Clemente, California USA
Distribution: Slackware - duh!
Posts: 520
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 112Reputation: 112
Cool Linus shoots from the hip, and calls a spade a spade...


Not strictly a Slackware matter, but I wanted to share this in my own group of gearheads and not the naive masses.

It looks like mACROsFOT is getting a little desperate again. Their standard M.O. of "Extend, Embrace, Exterminate" is, um... lol.

Well, it looks like the boiz over at Redhat are at it again, suckin' up to Redmond. But Linus gave them a good admonishing a couple of days ago for it - You go girl!

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/21/228

Enjoy

.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 01:46 PM   #2
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,231

Rep: Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828
The linked page doesn't seem to want to load for me, but I suspect it's the same topic as this arstechnica article I've just read:
http://arstechnica.com/information-t...oat-microsoft/
 
Old 02-26-2013, 01:47 PM   #3
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,880
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807
This is already the third thread about this topic, see here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...nt-4175451548/
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...nt-4175451575/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 02:19 PM   #4
tallship
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On the Beaches of Super Sunny Southern San Clemente, California USA
Distribution: Slackware - duh!
Posts: 520
Blog Entries: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 112Reputation: 112
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Well then @TobiSGD, perhaps I could interest you in this one?

https://picasaweb.google.com/1152077...58413061926434

Enjoy :

.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 02:52 PM   #5
irgunII
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Distribution: Slackware. What else is there?
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 40
And hence the reason why the whole UEFI crap is...crap and a Microshit attempt at control of *everything*, again. The *only* time anything 'Microshaft' should be trusted, is when it's not within 300 frigging miles of whatever it is one is working on. Kick their sellout asses Linus!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 03:18 PM   #6
ReaperX7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Distribution: LFS-SVN, Slackware-14.1, PCBSD-10.0
Posts: 2,427
Blog Entries: 14

Rep: Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590
Macroshaft loves trying to bone Linux any chance it gets.

I wish Linus would yank Linux away from Red Hat and forbid them to release, work on, or contribute anything to Linux anymore. I won't bring up why, again, but it involves a certain "developer" who shall be known as "He Who Shall Not Be Named".

Red Hat is evil... and I wouldn't be surprised if they've been in bed getting it on dirty and funky with Gates and Balmer before.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 03:19 PM   #7
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,880
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807
Quote:
Originally Posted by irgunII View Post
And hence the reason why the whole UEFI crap is...crap and a Microshit attempt at control of *everything*, again.
How is this related to UEFI? This is about keys for Secure Boot.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:28 PM   #8
ReaperX7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Distribution: LFS-SVN, Slackware-14.1, PCBSD-10.0
Posts: 2,427
Blog Entries: 14

Rep: Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590Reputation: 590
Well, the thing is if Microsoft is the key holder for Secure Boot, then they hold all the keys to the kingdom. They are the gatekeepers, and they say who is who, what is what, and this is that.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:38 PM   #9
bassplayer69
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: In a van down by the river...
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1 Multi-Lib
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Well, the thing is if Microsoft is the key holder for Secure Boot, then they hold all the keys to the kingdom. They are the gatekeepers, and they say who is who, what is what, and this is that.
Do mother boards give you the option to disable secure boot? If they do, then why does anyone care?
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:43 PM   #10
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,880
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807Reputation: 3807
Any motherboard/x86(_64) machine that is Windows 8 Logo certified must have the abilities to disable Secure Boot and to enable the user to add and remove keys at his own will, so Microsoft is far from being the gatekeeper.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 04:24 PM   #11
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 836

Rep: Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620Reputation: 1620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassplayer69 View Post
Do mother boards give you the option to disable secure boot? If they do, then why does anyone care?
Well, here's something to consider. So far, I've only heard about being able to turn Secure Boot on or off. There's no way to set it to on for this OS, and off for another. Windows 8 will work without Secure Boot, but what about Windows 9? Most of the people I've known who have gotten into Linux (including myself) started on a machine where they dual booted it with Windows. I still know many people who don't personally care for Windows, but still have to keep it around because of work, hardware that isn't supported on Linux, or for other reasons. If a future version of Windows refuses to work with secure boot deactivated, that's a pretty big hurdle for a new user who isn't willing to switch entirely away from Windows. And it seems like the technical hurdles for supporting Secure Boot on Linux are much larger for the new user unless we accept Microsoft as the sole key authority, since their key is the only one shipping in firmware.

I can't see how Secure Boot doesn't either result in less Linux adoption, or giving a lot more control over Linux to Microsoft... that's why I care.
 
12 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 04:25 PM   #12
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 1,410

Rep: Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630
"Wer in manchen Situationen nicht den Verstand verliert, der hat wahrscheinlich gar keinen." (Lessing)

Meaning: if you don't lose your mind in certain situations, then probably you don't have a mind.

So +1 for Linus.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 04:30 PM   #13
NyteOwl
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Any motherboard/x86(_64) machine that is Windows 8 Logo certified must have the abilities to disable Secure Boot and to enable the user to add and remove keys at his own will, so Microsoft is far from being the gatekeeper.

Indeed. If a motherboard "BIOS" does not have the ability to disable Secure Boot and add/remove keys then the people to complain to (loudly and long) is the motherboard manufacturers.

While this whole debacle may have been precipitated by Microsoft, they are not the only contributory player here.
 
Old 02-26-2013, 04:56 PM   #14
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,112

Rep: Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591Reputation: 1591
Quote:
I still know many people who don't personally care for Windows, but still have to keep it around because of work, hardware that isn't supported on Linux, or for other reasons.
i am one of those
"HR Block Tax Cut "
it is wrote in MS visual studio and calls IE by name

the move to ie7 killed it for a bit seeing as ie7 was also windows explorer7 .

and a few "dumb" games that are directX


personally i would love to see MS have to get singed keys from
RedHat
Debian
Slackware
FreeBSD
-- and so on
to get windows 7,8,9,???? to run

Put the shoe on the other foot
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2013, 06:27 PM   #15
bassplayer69
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: In a van down by the river...
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1 Multi-Lib
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Well, here's something to consider. So far, I've only heard about being able to turn Secure Boot on or off. There's no way to set it to on for this OS, and off for another. Windows 8 will work without Secure Boot, but what about Windows 9? Most of the people I've known who have gotten into Linux (including myself) started on a machine where they dual booted it with Windows. I still know many people who don't personally care for Windows, but still have to keep it around because of work, hardware that isn't supported on Linux, or for other reasons. If a future version of Windows refuses to work with secure boot deactivated, that's a pretty big hurdle for a new user who isn't willing to switch entirely away from Windows. And it seems like the technical hurdles for supporting Secure Boot on Linux are much larger for the new user unless we accept Microsoft as the sole key authority, since their key is the only one shipping in firmware.

I can't see how Secure Boot doesn't either result in less Linux adoption, or giving a lot more control over Linux to Microsoft... that's why I care.
Well, it's probably going to move to the same way CA's work for https where you have a hand full of companies issuing out CA's for web sites, but instead its for keys to be able to boot an OS. There will be the proprietary companies (e.g. Microsoft and Apple) and then Open Source companies (e.g. Red Hat and Shuttleworth's company). It'll just be sad if we have to pay for these keys by either buying the OS and a key comes with it, or the owner of the OS has to buy a key and distribute it with the OS if the OS is free, such as with Slackware.

Technology is probably going to progress to the point where we'll have to authenticate with our DNA from touching the power button before we can boot our computers...

Last edited by bassplayer69; 02-26-2013 at 06:28 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply

Tags
linus, linus torvalds


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linus Torvalds Calls NVIDIA The Worst Company Ever LXer Syndicated Linux News 8 06-20-2012 02:59 PM
LXer: Linus switches to Xfce, calls for a Gnome 2 fork LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-05-2011 06:50 AM
LXer: Linux' Linus calls Apple's file system 'complete and utter crap,' worse than Windows LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-15-2011 01:20 PM
LXer: Linus calls Linux 'bloated and huge' LXer Syndicated Linux News 3 09-24-2009 08:04 AM
LXer: Linus calls Linux 'bloated and huge' LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-22-2009 05:20 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration