LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I keep seeing deleted posts without any explanation every now and then as in this and this thread. It is quite annoying having a thread with answers and not knowing what the question was. Is there any chance to implement an "undelete" function? When someone deletes his posts they could be restored by a moderator if they are deemed important for the current context.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
In the second link you post, the member deleted their posts from multiple threads of theirs to get banned, and has been banned. I'm pretty sure revisions of edited posts are kept, so I assume it would be possible to restore the original posts, but I'd say mod's or Jeremy would have to do it. But it could be a lot of work if the member(s) in question have deleted a large number of their posts.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
In a similar thread I mentioned a forum I was a member of on which, once posted, all posts were saved and unchangeable. I really like that but what with the people duped by instagrans and the like I think it probably best just to delete posts. This included, if need be.
I keep seeing deleted posts without any explanation every now and then as in this and this thread. It is quite annoying having a thread with answers and not knowing what the question was. Is there any chance to implement an "undelete" function? When someone deletes his posts they could be restored by a moderator if they are deemed important for the current context.
IMO it is childish behavior by the people doing this, but LQ strives to respect its users freedoms as far as possible, and being childish is not usually harmful to others.
And while I disagree with doing this (removing one's posts because unsatisfied with replies), I would disagree even more if some mod would dig the originals up again.
... I would disagree even more if some mod would dig the originals up again.
I am not suggesting that every deleted post should be restored, e.g., sometimes people post in the wrong thread and then delete their post after they realize their mistake. Those posts do not need to be restored. But if posts are deleted that are essential to the thread (a mod would have to evaluate that) then I do not see a downside to restoring the post. I do not think that this is disrespecting someone's freedom, the members in linked threads were actually disrespectful.
Another issue is that Jeremy had made it clear on several occasions that threads/posts are not deleted because they may contain information that someone might find useful in the future. If those damaged/low quality threads/posts keep piling up, however, then people may very well come to the conclusion that LQ is a not a helpful but low quality forum. In the long run I think those threads are damaging to LQ and measures to contain the damage are justified.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Reading Jeremy's post #6, didn't he say that posts CAN be restored, but LQ would only do it if there was good reason?
I don't see how an OP who deletes their posts says anything about LQ being a "low quality forum" when they were given good/valid answers - which in the threads you link they were. That might say something about them, but it doesn't say anything about LQ as a forum. So I think you're wrong in forming that conclusion.
For what it's worth; allow the OP a certain amount of time (a few hours?) to edit posts. That way they can correct typos, format the post, etc. After that, lock the post (this can be done fully automagically in vBulletin). If the OP wants the post edited or deleted they can use the "Report Post" button to report their own post and ask a moderator to edit / remove.
Alternately, if you're the first poster to reply in a thread then quote the whole of the original post.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.