Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Mint 20, Kali, Peppermint, Ubuntu, MakuluFlash, Fedora 32, Windows 12 Lite, MakuluLinux
Posts: 821
Rep:
If you want security then use Tails.
Just found super secure Tails runs live from DVD or USB does not install and is only 1.1 GB.
It has a reasonable desktop including manual on the desktop. Main feature is the Tor Dark Web Browser that browses the usual web and the Dark web .onion sites.
I think it is so secure that the Thunderbird Mail on its Desktop does not work as it says the password is wrong every time when it is not wrong.
I'd think that many on this site have an opinion of these types of distro's. Part of my issue is the distro is made by hackers so saying it is secure seems to worry me. The fact that it isn't current worries me.
i'd just like to point out that it uses the "Tor Web Browser", and not the "Tor Dark Web Browser". that is likely a colourful (pun intended) addition made by OP.
Distribution: Mint 20, Kali, Peppermint, Ubuntu, MakuluFlash, Fedora 32, Windows 12 Lite, MakuluLinux
Posts: 821
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho
oh, there's nothing wrong with tails.
I would just like to point out that it uses the "Tor Web Browser", and not the "Tor Dark Web Browser". that is likely a colourful (pun intended) addition made by OP.
Good point.
I like the additional adjective, lets one know what it is about.
Still can't get a 32 bit version of Tails though.
Google does not help as their 32 bit version goes to the Tails site and loads the 64 bit version.
I bought a stick from a man on Amazon allegedly a 32 bit version.
It turned out to be a 64 bit version so he must have been fooled by Google.
Charged £11 for it too, asked for my money back no luck yet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.