LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2020, 05:06 PM   #1
GPGAgent
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2018
Location: Surrey UK
Distribution: Mint 20 xfce 64bit
Posts: 1,026
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Question Encrypted Email Service(s)


HushMail and ProtonMail both offer encrypted email services.


Do any LQ members use either of these and if so what is your experience.


Is there an alternative I could build myself with the normal range of Linux utils like ssl, pgp and mailservers?


A quick ddg has found a few pages I thought would help, but before delving in too far I'd like a few opinions from you guys.


My leaning is to ProtonMail - it's free to try and if I like it I would probably buy and annual licence .
 
Old 12-17-2020, 09:05 PM   #2
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
I use StartMail, which uses gnupg for encryption. It's convenient for encrypting email to someone for whom you have the public key, and it's possible to also encrypt using a shared secret. It's not free, but I'm happy to pay for the license. It's based in Europe, so the US government cannot subpoena anything from it.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-17-2020, 10:19 PM   #3
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,005
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
I use Hushmail at work, ProtonMail personally. I've had no issues with either, and find that they both seem to work quite well for what they're intended purpose is.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 01:09 AM   #4
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Quote:
Originally Posted by GPGAgent View Post
HushMail and ProtonMail both offer encrypted email services.
Do any LQ members use either of these and if so what is your experience.
Is there an alternative I could build myself with the normal range of Linux utils like ssl, pgp and mailservers?
A quick ddg has found a few pages I thought would help, but before delving in too far I'd like a few opinions from you guys.
My leaning is to ProtonMail - it's free to try and if I like it I would probably buy and annual licence .
I know a little about ProtonMail: it does not work with standard Email clients (although I believe Evolution and/or Thunderbird plugins exist), you need to use the web interface.

And, AFAIK, all these services cannot overcome the biggest hurdle: if a recipient is not on board with the program, you cannot send them encrypted mail.
Beyond that, e.g. Evolution (and I guess all serious mail clients) integrate PGP signing & encryption pretty well, and that should be is enough if both parties put in the extra effort.

All in all that makes it very doubtful to me whether sth like ProtonMail is even necessary at all, unless you plan to convince all your contacts to use it too.

That said, I see that there's a problem that cries for a solution.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-18-2020, 06:57 AM   #5
Michael Uplawski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,622
Blog Entries: 40

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by GPGAgent View Post

Is there an alternative I could build myself with the normal range of Linux utils like ssl, pgp and mailservers?
You could evaluate PrivateBin and see if it is what you want. There are a lot of PrivateBin instances already online, but installing the software on your own server should not be a big problem.

WEBLIBRE - https://zerobin.weblib.re
Le Filament - https://cles.le-filament.com/
Chapril - https://paste.chapril.org/
ilinux - https://postit.ilinux.fr/
DryCat - https://copycat.drycat.fr/
Zici.fr - https://pastebin.zici.fr/
Nomagic - https://paste.nomagic.uk/
Simon Vieille - https://privatebin.deblan.org/
roflcopter.fr - https://wtf.roflcopter.fr/paste/
Infini - https://bin.infini.fr/
Alolise - https://pastebin.alolise.org/
Framasoft - https://framabin.org/
UNDERWORLD - https://paste.underworld.fr/
Siick's services - https://bin.siick.fr/
Hadoly - https://postit.hadoly.fr/
3hg - https://3hg.fr/CHATONS/Pastebin/
-------- three more, which are not part of « Les Chatons » -------------
https://privatebin.net/
https://bin.disroot.org/
https://libre.nohost.me/zerobin/
 
Old 12-18-2020, 08:43 AM   #6
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,005
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho View Post
And, AFAIK, all these services cannot overcome the biggest hurdle: if a recipient is not on board with the program, you cannot send them encrypted mail.
How do you mean that? You can send anyone encrypted emails regardless through proton mail or Hushmail, they simply get emailed a link to read it online, it doesn't work in a client (for obvious reasons).

If you mean that if someone is too lazy to click a link they won't read your email, by the same token, if someone clicks delete when they see it's from you, they won't read your email, so doesn't really change anything in terms of how well they can read your email or not. As long as they have a modern browser installed, they can read it.

Last edited by Timothy Miller; 12-18-2020 at 08:45 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-18-2020, 09:27 AM   #7
GPGAgent
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2018
Location: Surrey UK
Distribution: Mint 20 xfce 64bit
Posts: 1,026

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Thumbs up

Thanks folks - food for thought there

I'll leave this unsolved for day or so for any further comments
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:30 AM   #8
GPGAgent
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2018
Location: Surrey UK
Distribution: Mint 20 xfce 64bit
Posts: 1,026

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgosnell View Post
I use StartMail, which uses gnupg for encryption. It's convenient for encrypting email to someone for whom you have the public key, and it's possible to also encrypt using a shared secret. It's not free, but I'm happy to pay for the license. It's based in Europe, so the US government cannot subpoena anything from it.
And at the moment it's only $29.99 at the moment
https://www.startmail.com/en/#pricing

Last edited by GPGAgent; 12-18-2020 at 09:35 AM.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 12:40 PM   #9
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Miller View Post
You can send anyone encrypted emails regardless through proton mail or Hushmail, they simply get emailed a link to read it online, it doesn't work in a client (for obvious reasons).
Thank you for correcting me there.
So how exactly does that work? Where's the security if it can be decrypted by any random mail recipient (who does not have the keys)?
And since the emailed link is sent unencrypted, it can be seen by many eyes.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 12:48 PM   #10
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,005
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
In Hushmail, you receive a link, following that link you set up a password to access the email if you haven't received Hushmail before. Once you have a password set up, you can actually access other emails from hushmail sent to your email address using that same password, although if at any point you forget the password and set a new one, any email still there is deleted. After setting up the password you can read the email online. It expires after 2 weeks. Protonmail is more or less the same, although you have to set up the password yourself and send it to the recipient in some way for them to read it. And it expires after 1 month.

Last edited by Timothy Miller; 12-18-2020 at 12:51 PM.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 12:51 PM   #11
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
I'm not familiar with Proton Mail nor Hushmail, but I know how it works on Startmail. It uses standard gnupg encryption/decryption for sending and receiving encrypted email, and will generate keys for you if you want. That works fine in Thunderbird, which also uses gnupg. You can use the same keys.

If the recipient does not use gnupg, you an send an encrypted message using a shared secret, set up in advance. Something along the lines of "What is your middle name", but preferably harder to guess. It's up to you as to what you use. The email is encrypted, and can only be encrypted by the word or phrase you agreed upon. It's just a password, and it can be anything you both know. The email is encrypted on the server, and only decrypted by the password. Anyone with the password can decrypt the message, so like any other password, it should be reasonably secure.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 01:28 PM   #12
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
^ & ^^ Ok so that's how it works.
Correct me if Im'wrong but there's nothing there that doesn't already work on a decent email client like evolution? The public key is the password?
 
Old 12-18-2020, 03:00 PM   #13
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
On an email client, you use gnupg with public/private keys. However the big problem with that is that so few people use gnupg, and most don't have any keys. The preshared secret method is for exchanging secure messages with the people who don't have them. It's not part of the usual gnupg/pgp process. ideally, everyone would have key pairs, with the public keys readily available, and the encryption/decryption would be seamless and easy to use. We do not live in ideal world, however. Therefore workarounds are sometimes necessary. You can read the details for Startmail here: Password protected messages
 
Old 12-18-2020, 11:08 PM   #14
Michael Uplawski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,622
Blog Entries: 40

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
With PrivateBin, the key is in the URL that you ... give to the recipient.

I would not use it for stuff which “must stay secret”; but then, email may not be the right thing to do anyway. Web-based anonymizing – or encrypting services are much less than a workaround. They are bad remedies for bad conscience and replace knowledge and comprehension, that you either seek or have to condone.

Personally, I use these services (PrivateBin only) to communicate to people whose mail-service I avoid contacting. Privacy is not really the issue.
 
Old 12-23-2020, 06:12 PM   #15
zeebra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,832
Blog Entries: 17

Rep: Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638Reputation: 638
Startmail is pretty solid and seems reliable and there are good advanced options.
I've been testing protonmail (free account) recently and it seems good too.

Looking into the topic a bit recently, there seems to be about 2-4 commonly mentioned alternatives as well, that I don't personally know:
tutanota
mailbox.org
 
  


Reply

Tags
email, encrypted, hushmail, protonmail



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Criptext Is A New Encrypted Email Service That Doesn't Store Your Emails * LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-31-2018 05:31 PM
LXer: FOSS Project Spotlight: Tutanota, the First Encrypted Email Service with an App on F-Droid LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-12-2018 02:45 AM
LXer: Tutanota: Encrypted Open Source Email Service for Privacy Minded People LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-18-2018 11:21 PM
Odd claim in Lavabit's pitch for their encrypted email service Peufelon General 9 06-15-2011 09:05 AM
Email server - solution - encrypted email filesystem dlugasx Linux - Server 1 02-12-2010 11:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration