peter_89 |
04-03-2006 09:42 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
Thats a good point. But I don't know if I can totally agree with your or not. After all, isn't most of Linux's security controls built in??
|
Yes, but Windows, by its very nature, is minimalistic. No, I'm not talking about the limited range of included apps, but rather about how security is fundamentally implemented in the kernel, registry, etc. *nix was FUNDAMENTALLY DESIGNED with security in the first place. Think about it: UNIX has always been an advanced network operating system for use in advanced environments. Linux takes after that. There's nothing wrong with how Windows is designed, it's just that it was designed with what the average computer user is going to need -- or not going to need, which in this case is advanced networking and security tools built in -- as when it WAS first being designed there was no threat of cracking from all around the world, only the cracking on private networks, which Windows was not meant for at the time. Microsoft kind of had to implement security features when they were needed -- therefore, there is no integration, and any "built-in" security features need to come from actual seperate programs. Let's be fair here, Windows does need to play catch-up to Linux when it comes to advanced security.
|