LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News
User Name
Password
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2008, 06:08 PM   #1
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 75
Who's Afraid of Firefox 3.0 Bugs?


As Firefox 3.0 inches ever closer to its final release, early testers seem pleased with the new features, performance enhancements, and improved look and feel of the next-generation browser. But not everyone is thrilled with how the Mozilla developers are rolling out their latest version. According to blogger Jason Clinton, the final version of Firefox 3.0 could ship with known critical bugs, at least one of which can bring Linux systems to their knees.

If you've already taken the plunge with the beta versions of Firefox yourself, you already know that not everything is yet rosy with the new browser, particularly when it comes to third-party extensions and add-ons. But I'll argue that a few rough edges aren't reason enough to hold off on the upgrade when the final version ships.

Why's that? Well, put simply, almost no software is 100 percent perfect when it ships, whether it's an open source project like Firefox or a proprietary, commercial offering. Just look at the ongoing problems related to bugs in Windows XP Service Pack 3. Symantec is pointing the finger at Microsoft, Microsoft says that third-party developers are to blame, and customers are left in a lurch.

By comparison, the new Firefox may still have some bugs, but the fact that they're coming to light now demonstrates one of the greatest strengths of the open source development process. With closed-source code like a Windows update, there's no way for independent analysts to figure out what's really causing a reported bug, and certainly no way to help correct it. On the other hand, the fact that users like Clinton can cast the spotlight on Firefox bugs early in the release process virtually ensures that Firefox's code quality will improve.

Of course, open source isn't perfect. Longtime Firefox 2.0 users will tell you that current releases of the browser have persistent bugs of their own, including memory leaks that have a nasty tendency to gobble up RAM over time. But many of these have reportedly been fixed in the new release-- which is yet another reason to look forward to the update.

As with any software, it's only appropriate to approach a major new upgrade with caution. But my own experience with the beta version of the browser tells me that Firefox 3.0 is a worthy successor to the current version. I'd go so far as to call it a must-have update-- just as long as the leading add-ons can catch up with compatible versions of their own in a timely fashion. Google, I'm looking at you.

Read here.
 
Old 05-24-2008, 09:38 PM   #2
anon099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
A lot of the problems I had with firefox 3+ has been the stupid adobe flash plugin. Installing flashblock has stopped 99% of problems. the 1% is that firebug doesn't work in 3 yet.
 
Old 05-25-2008, 12:01 AM   #3
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by padlamoij View Post
A lot of the problems I had with firefox 3+ has been the stupid adobe flash plugin. Installing flashblock has stopped 99% of problems. the 1% is that firebug doesn't work in 3 yet.
Color me stupid if you must, but I don't quite understand your problem. If you don't want to see any flash content, then don't bother installing the flash plugin. In my own personal experience, FF3 beta 5 has been the best yet for remembering what flash content you want to see and what you don't. My only problem was speed- start-up and loading pages. But then again, it was still in beta... some issues are to be expected, and if you care to read Mozilla's release notes, most are known and are being corrected.

Cheers
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:26 AM   #4
oskar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10
Posts: 1,142

Rep: Reputation: 49
I appreciate the new features, but I appreciate stability even more. Ideally I don't want any of the programs I use on a daily basis to crash - at all. I don't care who's to blame - if it's a problem with flash, but it doesn't affect the previous version, I'll stick with the previous version.

I'll try the final, but by the way it looks, I'll stick with Firefox-2 for another year or so.
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:37 AM   #5
NIN-Master
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Fedora core 9, Slax
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonslayer48dx View Post
If you don't want to see any flash content, then don't bother installing the flash plugin.

course you got the problems that arise from not installing it such as not being able to see streaming videos, etc
some sites require flash, but it also opens you up to flash ads *sighs*
but as you said, could wait till the bug is patched.

well im looking forward to the 3.0 release, I haven't yet had a chance to test it out but iv always liked to wait till the full release to update
 
Old 05-25-2008, 09:48 PM   #6
cheesylinuxuser
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: IL
Distribution: currently ubuntu 7.10
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Well, I've got Ubuntu 8.04 LTS with firefox 3 beta 5 on an inspiron b120 and have seen no problems with it. I normally dont install many add-ons, except for mininova. Honestly, I love it mainly for the fact that it loads your previous page after you close the brower, which can be turned off if I wanted. Also it's fast.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 07:37 AM   #7
taritom
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unfortunately I uninstalled it

I've also got Ubuntu 8.04 LTS with firefox 3 beta 5. I liked a lot of its features but one thing was awful with it. look at the Ubuntu home page capture below as an example:

http://taritom.googlepages.com/Scree...PageUbuntu.png

a lot of web pages appear this way.

I had to uninstall it and go back to ff2 and I am happy with it!

Last edited by taritom; 06-03-2008 at 07:41 AM.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 04:59 PM   #8
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by taritom View Post
I've also got Ubuntu 8.04 LTS with firefox 3 beta 5. I liked a lot of its features but one thing was awful with it. look at the Ubuntu home page capture below as an example:

http://taritom.googlepages.com/Scree...PageUbuntu.png

a lot of web pages appear this way.

I had to uninstall it and go back to ff2 and I am happy with it!
Wow! That's horrible!

I've never seen anything like that with any browser. But then again, I couldn't use FF2-- The default font on my install was unreadable, and I don't recall seeing anyone else with that issue... I can only guess that hardware/drivers still play a major role in how Linux/OSS installs and functions on any given PC.

I'd try again with the final release, though- it may have been a bug that's now fixed.

Cheers

Last edited by DragonSlayer48DX; 06-03-2008 at 05:01 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Firefox and Safari updates tackle alternative browser bugs LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-18-2008 05:30 AM
LXer: 900 fixed bugs with Mozilla Firefox 3 beta 2 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-11-2008 07:10 AM
LXer: Mozilla Fixes 24 Bugs In Firefox LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-15-2006 02:21 AM
Will Firefox Bugs affect the linux installion? hkl8324 General 1 06-13-2005 11:53 AM
Numerous bugs with SuSE 9.3 Pro's Firefox package Feral Linux - Software 1 05-18-2005 02:59 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration