Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Exactly, it was crap since day 1. It coincides with the EOL of Win7, so maybe finally I can transition my parents off of Windows then; since flash was the sole reason why I had to keep them on Windows. Sure Adobe finally updated flash to 26 in Linux, but sites would still not work right, because of a driver issue with NVIDIA. I only wish it was sooner than later; but I am sure that if it weren't for efforts by Apple, and Google to try to push flash away Adobe might have still clung to flash, hell even the developers at Facebook let their true feelings known. Only nice thing I can say, is that it had a good run, much too long, now it is time to make way for HTML5.
Problem is there are sites that are solely using flash - not just entertainment sites, but educational apparently.
Indeed. Also commercial sites. This way notice is given and businesses can make plans to port over to HTML5 etc. A much more sensible way of doing things rather than cutting support with no forewarning.
I know this would seem like a "no duh" - but I do hope that Adobe will just continue to patch security holes until EOL; discontinuing is one thing, but now Adobe should concentrate fully on just keeping flash secured until EOL.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.