Terminal browser with JS - anything newer than Elinks?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'd just assume you don't want a GUI browser, because of your limited resources. The problem here is, though, that basically no browser, that is lightweight enough to run on such old hardware, support Javascript, because implementing JS takes a huge behemoth of a engine to work properly. The most minimal implementations of a browser, that works with current Javascript stuff, are Badwolf and Surf. The difference between Badwolf and Surf is very small, although it should be noted, that Badwolf has a button to not load JS, when not needed, unlike Surf, which's Javascript can only be disabled, in the source code.
On a side note:
There is browsh, a frontend for firefox, which renders everything in CLI, and therefor is not lightweight.
There is Dillo, graphical browser, that has no JS support and only very basic CSS support, but is graphical and actually lightweight.
And finally, there is NetSurf, which renders CSS mostly fine and very basic Javascript, and still maintains a good resource footprint. https://dillo.org/ https://hacktivis.me/projects/badwolf https://surf.suckless.org/
I'd just assume you don't want a GUI browser, because of your limited resources. The problem here is, though, that basically no browser, that is lightweight enough to run on such old hardware, support Javascript, because implementing JS takes a huge behemoth of a engine to work properly. The most minimal implementations of a browser, that works with current Javascript stuff, are Badwolf and Surf. The difference between Badwolf and Surf is very small, although it should be noted, that Badwolf has a button to not load JS, when not needed, unlike Surf, which's Javascript can only be disabled, in the source code.
On a side note:
There is browsh, a frontend for firefox, which renders everything in CLI, and therefor is not lightweight.
There is Dillo, graphical browser, that has no JS support and only very basic CSS support, but is graphical and actually lightweight.
And finally, there is NetSurf, which renders CSS mostly fine and very basic Javascript, and still maintains a good resource footprint. https://dillo.org/ https://hacktivis.me/projects/badwolf https://surf.suckless.org/
Thanks.
Yes - as I've mentioned above browsh relies on FF so it's not lightweight,
I've tried NS & Dillo on multiple sites previously. Rendering was poor & most sites were broken. They don't seem to be actively maintained, though NS has a mailing list with occasional questions popping up.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.