LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2017, 04:38 PM   #1
scasey
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Distribution: CentOS 7.9.2009
Posts: 5,727

Rep: Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211
opinions about distro for older hardware


Dell Latitude D600
1GB RAM
80GB hard drive (I think...might be 60GB)

Widows XP wasn't working, so loaded CentOS 5 awhile back that is (as you can imagine) a dog on this underpowered laptop
Tried to upgrade to later CentOS, but hardware is apparently not compatible
(I run CentOS 7 on new production servers)
Based on research here, I'm thinking lubuntu -- thoughts?

Also old HP desktop.
1GB RAM
80GB hard drive.
Also running CentOS 5 -- it performs some better, but still pretty slow.
also lubuntu?

Thanks for any suggestions.
 
Old 11-17-2017, 08:30 PM   #2
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Yeah you can try Lubuntu.

http://lubuntu.net/

You can also give Anti-X a spin. It's designed for older pc's.-

http://antix.mepis.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

OR> run Puppy Linux Live and see if you like it.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-17-2017, 09:12 PM   #3
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,005
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
I'd say Anti-X or q4os for me. However that old you might have video issues.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 12:05 AM   #4
!!!
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2017
Location: Fremont, CA, USA
Distribution: Trying any&ALL on old/minimal
Posts: 997

Rep: Reputation: 382Reputation: 382Reputation: 382Reputation: 382
Maybe try 'longshot' Zorin, which I and others had amazing success with (tho 'heavier')
Note DistroWatch.com search for 'Old Computers'. Is it this model?
Once/if you find a distro you like on it, It might be worth the $15 to upgrade to 2x1G ram (2x512M currently?)
The ol' D600 was one of the most common/popular laptops (32bit)
 
Old 11-18-2017, 01:00 AM   #5
watchingu
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian Stable, Debian Unstable
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: 17
BunsenLabs, a community continuation of CrunchBang, should work fine on both of those laptops. BunsenLabs uses a combination of the Openbox window manager and the Tint2 panel to create a desktop environment. However, the development team is still working on the stable release of Helium, which is basically a customized Debian Stretch. If you don't want to wait for the official release, checkout this thread for details on installing a beta version of Helium.

Last edited by watchingu; 11-18-2017 at 01:03 AM.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 03:26 AM   #6
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Rep: Reputation: 47
Debian Linux minimal version with LXDE desktop would also be a good option.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 10:50 AM   #7
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
My personal preference would be Debian with XFCE4, but in any case the big performance bottleneck will be the slow CPU (400Mhz Pentium M?)

I have a few computers that slow, but I don't use them for anything heavier than mp3 playing and XFCE4-terminals, sometimes VNC client for a faster computer. Web browsing is extremely limited.

That said, my slow computers also have much less RAM than 1GB.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 11:06 AM   #8
DavidMcCann
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Debian
Posts: 6,142

Rep: Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314
The published specs show a Pentium M with 400 MHz FSB. If that's the case, you have the Banias version which does not show the PAE support flag: PAE is actually there, but distros that want it won't run because they think it isn't.

AntiX will definitely work straight away. Any distro should work if you add "forcepae" to the kernel parameters. On my Pentium-M Thinkpad, I use Salix.

PS the fact that you don't need PAE with only 1GM is irrelevant: if the kernel wants it, it insists on having it!

Last edited by DavidMcCann; 11-18-2017 at 11:09 AM.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 12:01 PM   #9
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann View Post
The published specs show a Pentium M with 400 MHz FSB. If that's the case, you have the Banias version which does not show the PAE support flag: PAE is actually there, but distros that want it won't run because they think it isn't.

AntiX will definitely work straight away. Any distro should work if you add "forcepae" to the kernel parameters. On my Pentium-M Thinkpad, I use Salix.

PS the fact that you don't need PAE with only 1GM is irrelevant: if the kernel wants it, it insists on having it!
Certainly Debian will run out-of-box. I use the 686-pae release of Debian on plenty of computers without PAE and it just plain works. The kernel most definitely does NOT insist upon having it.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 12:30 PM   #10
scasey
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Distribution: CentOS 7.9.2009
Posts: 5,727

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211
Quote:
Originally Posted by !!! View Post
Is it this model?
Yup. PROCESSOR, 80536, PENTIUM M DOTHAN, Pentium M Dothan, 1.8GHZ, 2 MEGB, 400FSB, PLASTIC GRID ARRAY, B1
2 DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULE, 512, 333, 64X64, 8K, 200

Thanks to you all. I'll do some digging and trying (there's nothing needs to be preserved on either 'puter..I used the HP desktop to get familiar with CentOS 5 before building the production webserver. The laptop I just gave up on and bought an 8GB PC with a 500GB HDD desktop, then loaded CentOS 5 on the laptop.) Struggled for months to get the wifi working, then a solution just showed up in the repos...it runs well enough at the CLI, but the GUI is (maybe) even slower than Win XP ('twas a long time ago...)

Last edited by scasey; 11-18-2017 at 12:44 PM.
 
Old 11-18-2017, 12:38 PM   #11
Mill J
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2017
Location: @127.0.0.1
Distribution: Mint, Void, MX, Haiku, PMOS, Plasma Mobile, and many others
Posts: 1,258
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
Puppy Linux! I'm running Tahrpup 32bit on an old Compaq computer that has 500mb ram. and only 80gb harddrive. Puppy is one of the easiest and fastest Os that I've run so far.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-18-2017, 04:59 PM   #12
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by scasey View Post
Yup. PROCESSOR, 80536, PENTIUM M DOTHAN, Pentium M Dothan, 1.8GHZ, 2 MEGB, 400FSB, PLASTIC GRID ARRAY, B1
2 DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULE, 512, 333, 64X64, 8K, 200

Thanks to you all. I'll do some digging and trying (there's nothing needs to be preserved on either 'puter..I used the HP desktop to get familiar with CentOS 5 before building the production webserver. The laptop I just gave up on and bought an 8GB PC with a 500GB HDD desktop, then loaded CentOS 5 on the laptop.) Struggled for months to get the wifi working, then a solution just showed up in the repos...it runs well enough at the CLI, but the GUI is (maybe) even slower than Win XP ('twas a long time ago...)
You're Welcome.

Let us know how things go and what distributions works for you on your machines.

Cheers:-
 
Old 11-18-2017, 06:37 PM   #13
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Oh! 1.8Ghz Pentium M! Sorry I read a bad reference (CNET). I actually have one very old laptop with a 400mhz Pentium M, so the bad reference didn't stick out to me as a red flag.

There's a world of performance difference between a 400mhz Pentium M and a 1.8Ghz Pentium M. That is actually not too bad for web browsing, watching video files, and general use. YouTube performance will be so-so, though, and you can forget about Netflix. I've got similar 1.8Ghz machines and it's utterly hopeless for Netflix.

Anyway, Debian with XFCE4 will run just fine on that laptop.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Distro for older hardware jbbacher Linux - General 6 03-17-2011 07:49 PM
Distro's for Older hardware ? bigjohn Linux - General 0 02-25-2006 07:47 PM
Good distro for older hardware? Luke727 Linux - Hardware 1 04-29-2004 05:40 PM
Looking for a fast distro for older hardware? frontier1 Linux - Distributions 2 12-18-2003 05:53 AM
Best Distro/kernel for my hardware?? OPINIONS WANTED ;-D hopinator Linux - Hardware 8 09-17-2002 07:45 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration