LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2016, 09:10 AM   #16
lazydog
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: The Key Stone State
Distribution: CentOS Sabayon and now Gentoo
Posts: 1,249
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habitual View Post
Way too much speculation and conjecture.
Whatever the source of their "desperation", I predict the next Windows upgrade will be mandatory and it will cost money.

End Transmission.
That would be the knife in the back for them. People would flee from Windows if that comes about.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:35 AM   #17
MadmanRB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Location: In your mind
Distribution: Linux Mint 19.1
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well they would probably play it safe, if there is a windows 11 it will cost but I cannot imagine Microsoft charging a lot of money for it.
They are already under the microsope.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 06:03 PM   #18
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941
Quite frankly, I think that Microsoft Corporation would do well to take a few sobering lessons from Linux ... as Apple, long ago, has done. (And, for that matter, "ditto IBM!")
  • "Ownership of a proprietary operating system" does not "give you prerogatives." In business, you serve your customers. It is never "the other way around."
  • If you actually listen to your customers, they will tell you exactly what to do, and what they need(!) from you, and they will reward you very well for doing it.
  • Let me repeat: your customers need you. They are (still!) your customers for that very reason, and said reason is not(!) likely to change.
  • "In spite of yourself(!)," you have been a successful company for many decades. But you have also been "your bull-headed own worst enemy(!)" for approximately the same amount of time.
  • "Therefore, methinks," your best(!) days could be "yet to come." . . .
 
Old 02-10-2016, 11:44 PM   #19
MadmanRB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Location: In your mind
Distribution: Linux Mint 19.1
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well as I mentioned on another board I think Microsoft doesnt want another Windows XP.
Windows 7 for many is the new XP, its stable, reliable and works as it should (well in my opinion, as I actually really like Windows 7).
Contrast that to windows 8 and well you get the issue.
And yes both Apple and Linux are a viable threat and always will be, but Microsoft in the end will still be its own worst competition.
 
Old 02-12-2016, 02:53 PM   #20
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941
The thread that I just posted, "You knew Microsoft was spying, but you never knew how much," is probably the closest thing to the truth behind Microsoft's "suspiciously desperate" actions.
 
Old 02-12-2016, 09:02 PM   #21
MadmanRB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Location: In your mind
Distribution: Linux Mint 19.1
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The problem with that argument is they have snuck those spying features into windows 7 and 8, it plays a small role yes but not enough to justify the insanity of microsoft right now
 
Old 02-12-2016, 09:07 PM   #22
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth&Mars (I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that work on freest-HW; has been KDE, CLI, Novena-SBC but open.. http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,888
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567
Their scared of fre(w)e...
 
Old 02-17-2016, 02:49 PM   #23
patchthekernel
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2016
Distribution: PCBSD 9 | NetBSD 7 | Mint 17.3
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 9
M$ is forcing windows 10 on everyone is because they don't trust what their customers are doing on their windows 10 platform. They think you're a baby and need monitoring. If windows 10 could speak it would say the following. For example


I see you are running a pirated M$ product

I see you are pirating mp3s and bootleg movies

I see your are watching porn

I see you are running linux in virtual machine

I got my eye on you. Naughty, naughty, you.

Oh, yes! I will be selling your habits to others. We need to make more money out of you.

Last edited by patchthekernel; 02-17-2016 at 02:52 PM.
 
Old 02-18-2016, 04:26 AM   #24
Arcane
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Latvia, Europe
Distribution: random
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: 312Reputation: 312Reputation: 312Reputation: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habitual View Post
If you don't think MS's motives are profit driven, you are sadly mistaken.
There is a fragile line between profit based market and overdosed false sense of authority. Besides how can you call this selling method profit driven action? It is absurd! If you force people, even those who would still buy their OS, to use latest stuff, that is not even ultimatum - something worse mixed with stupidity. It is like tyre manufactures will suddenly say "You want to use our new tyres? You will have to buy new car aswell!"

Last edited by Arcane; 02-18-2016 at 04:27 AM. Reason: typo
 
Old 02-20-2016, 12:49 PM   #25
maples
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Jessie
Posts: 814

Rep: Reputation: 265Reputation: 265Reputation: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcane View Post
There is a fragile line between profit based market and overdosed false sense of authority. Besides how can you call this selling method profit driven action? It is absurd! If you force people, even those who would still buy their OS, to use latest stuff, that is not even ultimatum - something worse mixed with stupidity. It is like tyre manufactures will suddenly say "You want to use our new tyres? You will have to buy new car aswell!"
This may be a string of stupid questions, but how does this actually work? Aren't the Skylake processors still amd64? And will this affect the ability of Linux to run on it?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Windows 10: A comfort blanket for Microsoft's biz users LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-21-2015 01:31 AM
LXer: Microsoft push C++ instead of C#? LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-06-2013 08:30 PM
LXer: When Push Comes To Shove: Microsoft's EU Proposals LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-27-2009 07:10 PM
LXer: Microsoft Message To Windows Users…Shut Up And Pay Up. LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 02-12-2006 11:50 AM
DESPERATE : Iptables block users by MAC address. ranjan303 Linux - Security 28 03-29-2005 01:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration