Quote:
Quote:
I think it's very easy now to convert GNU/Linux into spying operating system. All you need to do is to implement spying functionality in systemd and make it so noone can opt out. And there you go! Systemd is now pretty much in every distro and amount of distros adopting this technology grows. There definitelly will be distos without systemd but those will probably be marginal and not very good in general. Not a lot of people will use them. Like, 95% of desktop Linux users will use systemd-based distros and will be spied. So there you go, there's your free GNU/Linux (as in freedom, not free beer). :rolleyes: Quote:
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke The solution I have (at least for me) is:
That's just what I do to minimize spreading data about me. But as I said, it becomes harder and harder by every year and someday I'll just say "enough is enough". |
Quote:
Also to mention here, GNU/Linux degraded to a complete garbage. It looks ugly, it works barely, it has thrown out it's UNIX-like ideology and beauty of architecture (or it rather never had it). So Linux is garbage and I am not inetersted in computers any more. Thus "Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I am beginning to conclude that Mr. Alex is merely a troll. He pretends to know something about Linux when he clearly doesn't (which may be why any of his trials failed) yet he chooses to come to LinuxQuestions.org to bitch and moan on not one but at least two threads.
Mr. Alex if Windows suits you better so what? Nobody cares. I certainly am not offended nor worried and you can take it to the bank that I don't habituate WindowsQuestions.org (generic term but hopefully you get it) just to rant about how much Windows bloze goats. So what do you expect to receive as a dividend to your "investment" here, Mr Conservative? (If I am jumping to conclusions that you think yourself a Capitalist, my apologies) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
From the beginning, I consider the original question a Lifestyle-question. I should not expect more from a thread under “General” but fall into the same trap sometimes.
|
Quote:
|
One more thought...
Quote:
Why exactly did you call me a troll? Don't worry, I'm not "offended". I am curious because it seems to me you have probably been "triggered". If so it makes you a liberal. Are you one? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
That doesn't remotely sound like anything I run....want are you running? dsl, tiny core? ;) Quote:
I don't care what OS or browser you use... We use what works best for us. I'll tell you how I keep my data private on my Windows 7 box(that I rarely boot). It's has never been and probably never will be, connected to the net. ;) |
Lunduke IS A FAR RIGHT GOVERNMENT SHILL talking out his ass
If I could block his videos on youtube I would |
So a few things Mr. Alex, after reading your recent posts they are to say the least, confusing or misleading...In one post you claim to use Windows, in another you claim to use GNU/Linux and to promote it, in another post you say GNU/Linux is complete garbage...Which one is it? It reminds me of a story about a man who claims to hate coffee, goes on a long diatribe of how coffee is destroying the environment, adding to slavery and indentured servitude, causing forests to be cut down etc... and then orders a refill of his coffee and pays with his Starbucks Gold card.
You are correct that just being opensource/FOSS, does not ensure immunity of programs, it does, however, lessen the chance and also increases the likelihood of those problems being discovered and corrected or if need be forked by another group. Look at openSSL versus LibreSSL, etc... I can tell you that closed source/proprietary software almost ensures the likelihood of what you described. Microsoft called their OS Windows for a reason, they could have also used OpenDoor OS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
FYI it is ignorant oversimplification to see the world of humans as a binary Left vs/ Right division. People just aren't that simple, though many may try to be. I was an usher at Ayn Rand lectures and subscribed to The Freeman during the 60s and early 70s. I trust that the government which governs least, governs best. I am confidant that Laissez Faire Capitalism is indeed the economic expression of Democracy where dollars are votes. However I am also aware that the fundamental forces implied in "The Rich get Richer, while the Poor get Poorer" is real and tends to create a condition where the Haves will get Laissez Faire subverted to enact laws that benefit them at everyone else's expense, thus requiring some level of "reset" since we never begin with a level playing field. I am Pro Choice and Anti Death Penalty, the latter not so much because it is cruel to the convicted, but because it is cruel (and costly) to Civilization and especially those that must carry out executions but perhaps most importantly because so many convicted Death Row inmates have been proven innocent by such things as DNA. Police and government officials are quick to zero in and convict by any and all means and even by unlawful methods they hope to keep hidden since Death Penalty cases provide good PR and photo ops. So, hopefully you can see that I don't fit some simplistic definition of Right or Left. In some areas I suppose you would consider me Liberal and in others further to the Right than a bicycle on the Autobahn, but I don't care for pigeonholes. They are convenient to closed minds to avoid critical thought at any expense so that what they view as the opposite can be written off with no thought process required. It is by nature, intellectually lazy and blind.... IMHO of course ;) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM. |