GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Dabble, but latest used are Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.4.1
Posts: 425
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fixit7
I hope they do not retire the A-10. . . . It's cheaper to operate and much more survivable.
I question the accuracy of the survivability (sp?) comment. The A-10 was used back when I was in the service in the late 1970s, and was used long before that. It is vulnerable against hand-held surface-to-air missles, which everyone has these days. Small drones with machine guns, operated at the company level, is what I would use. Put up five or six of those and have at 'em.
I question the accuracy of the survivability (sp?) comment. The A-10 was used back when I was in the service in the late 1970s, and was used long before that. It is vulnerable against hand-held surface-to-air missles, which everyone has these days. Small drones with machine guns, operated at the company level, is what I would use. Put up five or six of those and have at 'em.
No it wasn't it was introduced into service in '77 it's a post Vietnam aircraft. It filled the role the A 1 played in Vietnam, it's a craft that hasn't been made since the mid '80's and needs a replacement that is as capable.
Last edited by Germany_chris; 02-03-2016 at 10:15 AM.
Perhaps Fixit7 was loosely using the term "survivability" in reference to the relative not only tried-and-true nature of the A10 (which also has some advantage in being very tightly focused specifically use designed as opposed to the F35 which was hoped to have much wider application - think Sybil levels of multiple personality syndrome) but also it's use of discrete components that make upgrade options more numerous and possible than the highly integrated nature of the F35, whose problems began very early in design stages before one was even built, massively above budget and a sinkhole ever since.. The entire history of the F35 just screams "boondoggle" and is possibly the most universally hated military plane ever conceived. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the date of 2017 for A10 retirement was pushed ahead a few years until other options might become possible, somewhat similar to how Grumman's Tomcat was upgraded and utilized long past it's expected time of service. It just worked.
I knew several pilots in the Virginia Beach area who had very mixed feelings about the Tomcat's retirement date who while certainly concerned with how "long in the tooth" it was and excitedly looking forward to advanced technology, but had deep concerns that any replacement would or even could measure up to the overall confidence earned by the Tomcat. Apparently and thankfully some high level "shot callers" actually listen to pilots and crew. It would come as quite a surprise to me that the F35 can ever recover from it's myriad problems and ever become a reliable option, at the very least for very long. A10 is respected for good reasons and the F35 is equally supported by good reasons but to retire quietly and ASAP. It has certainly been an albatross around Lockheed Martin's neck for far too long.
Movieman99 may be on to something according to F35 vs/ Dones and this article is just a sample of like-minded opinion all over.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.