2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2014. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Programming Language of the Year
Like some of the other categories there is not a single answer I can select. C/C++ is a base for other languages so perhaps there should be a separate grouping for languages programmed using another one.
Rust will be the programming language 2015, when 1.0 is released.
2016 is still open
2017 next C++ standard, introducing (hopefully) concepts (light)
so there is obviously no need to have this poll every year
I'm curious, have those who voted C++ had a Good Look at what D is now? http://dlang.org/
Remember Andrei Alexandrescu, the guy who wrote that frighteningly clever "Modern C++ Design" book? Much of the scary clever magic behind Boost was inspired by/ kicked off by that.
Except Andrei seems to be unusual in the class of Genius coders...
He has stepped back from all that cleverness, and said, "It shouldn't have to be so hard" and started designing his own language.
And then he stepped one step further back and instead of writing yet another language, started contributing to Walter Bright's D language.
Result?
All that insane cleverness poured into making things simple, easy, Right.
Instead of brain twisting template meta-programming, Compile Time Function Evaluation.
Instead of STL iterators.... Ranges.
Oh my! Those things are my favourite example of achieving Power AND Simplicity by choosing the Right abstraction.
I'm curious, have those who voted C++ had a Good Look at what D is now? http://dlang.org/
yes, I followed D already from the very beginning.
it is an interesting language, but the code generation it has makes it more easy to write unmaintainable code than C++ and therefore only for generic freak like Alexandrescu acceptable ( I am just kidding, but not just)
one of the greatest mistake it made was to compare itself with C++ and marketing itself as a system language.
it should have come up as a better pyhton or so, would have made more sense somehow. (GC is still a problem, look at the D talks from the DLang conference, not even the D devs deny that in high performance parts you can not use the GC and there is also a project that trys to imporve GC , but therefor duppples memory consumption ...(
and an other thing is, bringing a language without tools support like ide support and debugger in nowadays only for a very view people interesting.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.