2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by tormented_one Hey about your fish tank, you will get better results using peat to "stain" the water. Your best bet is to get some peat filter media and use that. That should soften and lower the ph of the water. I have a 220 community tank, a 135 gal with bluegill and bass(one blue cat as well), 55 cichlid tank, and 3 10 gallons for breeding. To get the best color from your tetras make sure you feed a variety of quality food.
I cheated. I got some stuff in a bottle to soften the water. May get something else before long, maybe a RO thingy. Oh, it don't turn my water to a tea color either. It was cool at first but it sort of wears off after a while.
Originally posted by tormented_one Hey about your fish tank, you will get better results using peat to "stain" the water. Your best bet is to get some peat filter media and use that. That should soften and lower the ph of the water. I have a 220 community tank, a 135 gal with bluegill and bass(one blue cat as well), 55 cichlid tank, and 3 10 gallons for breeding. To get the best color from your tetras make sure you feed a variety of quality food.
When we include Debian-based distros in one total (as several of us suggested) it is the clear top choice. Lest anyone call foul, here are some other combined lineage totals:
Originally posted by impeteperry Rick, comparing all the "RPM" package distros with all the "APT" distros gives me a more interesting result. What say?
Pete(?), I have 2 answers --
Tongue-in-cheek: "Just shows the majority is not always right,"
More seriously: Although many of us think that APT is the superior tool, that is not the point. It's the Debian Social Contract and the repositories that go with it. What if we compared the distros that can be maintained from the Debian repositories (& yes my Debian list might lose a couple) with those that can use up2date, or YaST, or whatever? What then?
Originally posted by koby ummm does slackware and suse go together ? and how so? slackware and suse appear miles appart in my opinion.
I was hoping someone would take the bait, although I wasn't trawling in the normal sense.
Remember I said I was stretching when I put RH w/ Mandrake & SuSE w/ Slack. I presume that "everyone knows" that Mandrake was originally derived from RH; but I was surprised to find that SuSE was originally derived from Slack: (http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displays.../18/182953/306)
Quote:
Of the "major" distributions out there, only SuSE has any direct lineage to Slackware (originally being a simple repackaging, it has grown into its own -- the only remaining Slackware legacy is its diskset structure).
I assume someone more familiar than I with the two can verify the alleged "remaining Slackware legacy".
I don't see the difference between a tarball installation against a binary nstallation when the distro packages the binaries themselves for optimum performance?
Unless we are talking post install and bleading edge updating where binaries would certainly lag behind when waiting for the distro optimised binaries?
When I need to manually confire a particular app / service I use a tarball
source. When I just want to run an app, if it has a binary distro for SuSE I just grab that and done.
Am I missing something in this thread re: apt v bin??
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.