LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2012, 10:47 PM   #121
baldzhang
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

update scim please

i test scim with 14.0 rc1, found following problems
1: xfce-terminal can not input
2: program written with Lazarus/fpc, when i input some chinese word, one keyboard hit become two char input
3: use tigervnc 1.1.0 from Eric for remote management, scim does not work at all. run xfce 4.10 in vnc also

then i rebuild scim 1.4.14 from source, the problem resolved, so please update the scim packages. thanks.
 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:16 AM   #122
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,062

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Done in Slackware 14 RC2

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 08-16-2012 at 03:18 AM.
 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:18 AM   #123
D1ver
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 598
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194
I'm not sure if it's me doing something wrong or not, but the slackbuild script for Java JDK in /extra seems to be a little funny.
I built and installed a package using the slackbuild script and the jdk-7u5-linux-x64.tar.gz file from Oracle. However it seems to have installed everything (libs, bin, include) into /usr/lib64/java.
Code:
bash-4.2$ ls /usr/lib64/java/
COPYRIGHT  README.html			bin  include  lib  release
LICENSE    THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt	db   jre      man  src.zip
Is this the expected behavior? Things in /usr/lib64/java/bin don't show up in my path as desired..
 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:25 AM   #124
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by D1ver View Post
I'm not sure if it's me doing something wrong or not, but the slackbuild script for Java JDK in /extra seems to be a little funny.
I built and installed a package using the slackbuild script and the jdk-7u5-linux-x64.tar.gz file from Oracle. However it seems to have installed everything (libs, bin, include) into /usr/lib64/java.
Code:
bash-4.2$ ls /usr/lib64/java/
COPYRIGHT  README.html			bin  include  lib  release
LICENSE    THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt	db   jre      man  src.zip
Is this the expected behavior? Things in /usr/lib64/java/bin don't show up in my path as desired..
You need to logout and login again to effectuate the changed environment (a file /etc/profile.d/jdk.sh was added by the package which adds the java bin directory to $PATH amongst others).

Eric
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-16-2012, 03:28 AM   #125
D1ver
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 598
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
You need to logout and login again to effectuate the changed environment (a file /etc/profile.d/jdk.sh was added by the package which adds the java bin directory to $PATH amongst others).

Eric
Like usual it's me doing something wrong

Thank you sir!
 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:53 AM   #126
D1ver
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 598
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by D1ver View Post
Like usual it's me doing something wrong

Thank you sir!
Edit:
Never mind.. I didn't download the profile.d/ directory and it's contents into the same directory as the slackbuild and source so I was missing a few files.

Working now that I'm doing things properly..

Last edited by D1ver; 08-16-2012 at 04:11 AM.
 
Old 08-16-2012, 05:24 AM   #127
zakame
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Slackware
Posts: 295

Rep: Reputation: 181Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by chess View Post
I_prefer_underscores.
Can%20I%20%play%20too?
 
Old 08-16-2012, 05:33 AM   #128
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762
@zakame: No, its too ugly and doesn't work everywhere. The cool kids, _ - and . laugh in its general direction.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-16-2012, 05:55 AM   #129
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,477
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by zakame View Post
Can%20I%20%play%20too?
only if you:
Code:
sed "\ "/"-"/g


I tend to agree with Alien Bob - space really just make a show stop, sooner or later.

I even tend to use three character names for my "sceleton" lately:

doc,dld,src,bin

so when I have to type from "unusual spaces" as midp2 (phone java) terminals are, i just suffer for three codes, leave alone those "\ " spaces

=2c
P.S.
lazy typers are "the great way of UNIX" IMHO
 
Old 08-16-2012, 05:59 AM   #130
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,901

Rep: Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025Reputation: 5025
I make an exception for my music collection for aesthetic reasons, but otherwise I'm down with the no-to-spaces crowd.

Do we need to start an "Occupy 0x20" movement?
 
Old 08-16-2012, 08:18 PM   #131
shadowsnipes
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,443

Rep: Reputation: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3slider View Post
It could be fixed by quoting but I tend to agree with Alien Bob:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
Using spaces in directory names is not supported by Slackware's scripts. I also do not support it in any of my own scripts. I even have a script (massconvert32.sh) which aborts when it detects a space in the directory name.

Spaces in directory names is an abomination introduced by MS Windows and lazy-ass GUI programs. Real UNIX men avoid space.
I didn't realize that spaces in directory names was not supported in Slackware scripts...didn't see this in the Readme. Generally I don't use them myself; I usually use '_' instead and haven't run into any issues. For testing purposes, however, I love spaces (and long paths) because they can throw off some programs that haven't accounted for it.

Onto RC2...
 
Old 08-17-2012, 02:17 AM   #132
kingbeowulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,266
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 744Reputation: 744Reputation: 744Reputation: 744Reputation: 744Reputation: 744Reputation: 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
...nobody uses 32-bit Slackware anymore?)...
I have used x86_64 as my main box since the initial release of SLAMD64, and then Slackware64. 32-bit lives in a Virtualbox and qemu VM for compiling and testing. I haven't noticed any liloconfig errors within these VMs.

I just dusted off an old P3 Compaq Armada E500 and ugraded from Slackware 13.1 to 14 RC2. No issues here either.
 
Old 08-17-2012, 02:56 AM   #133
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
nobody uses 32-bit Slackware anymore?
Or they just don't use lilo. I now prefer Syslinux myself.
 
Old 08-17-2012, 12:15 PM   #134
cmk77
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: netherlands
Distribution: debian, rocky, slackware
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 25
Any chance of upgrading to xfig 3.2.5?
 
Old 08-17-2012, 05:41 PM   #135
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,523

Rep: Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489Reputation: 8489
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmk77 View Post
Any chance of upgrading to xfig 3.2.5?
Nope. We tried it before, and it was severely bug ridden compared to what we had, so we reverted. Not to say we won't look into it again, but not now.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bug reports, using them microsoft/linux Debian 1 10-12-2005 07:22 AM
bug reports with apt-get MaTrIx709 Debian 2 07-27-2005 06:05 PM
bug reports on glibc or gcc tvburger Linux From Scratch 1 12-06-2004 12:43 AM
10.1 Beta Cycle Begins, send those bug reports in ! doug_s Mandriva 0 07-24-2004 09:34 AM
How to submit bug reports to Mandrakesoft? registering Mandriva 2 06-04-2004 09:32 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration