LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Poll: Should slackware get modernized for today's computers?
Poll Options
Should slackware get modernized for today's computers?

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

Yes
No

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-07-2011, 12:39 PM   #1
Frank111
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2011
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 10
Should slackware get modernized for today's computers?


Greetings,

This is my first poll on this forum.

I am a big fan of slackware and Arch. And, I believe it's time for slackware to get modernized. Packages are either optimize for i386 and i486. It's time to get i686 optimized for better performance.

Secondly, it's time for slackware to start doing package dependency handling. I don't mind handling the dependencies myself, but there are times when it gets to much when those dependencies requires their own dependencies to be resolved.

C'mon, It's 2011 and not the nineties. I don't believe there are that many people using i386 and i486 desktops and/or laptops.

In summary, slackware is a great distro and can do even better if optimized like the i686 distros.

It's time for slackware to get modernized.

You'll probably guessed my vote is yes and it is.

- later

Last edited by Frank111; 09-07-2011 at 12:42 PM.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 09-07-2011, 12:46 PM   #2
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1/Current, CentOS 6.5/7.0
Posts: 792

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Slackware has been modernized in form of some really good and close derivatives like Salix.
(I don't use Slackware full time but I use Salix occasionally.)

My 2 cents.

Regards.
Prince.
 
Old 09-07-2011, 12:52 PM   #3
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank111 View Post
Secondly, it's time for slackware to start doing package dependency handling. I don't mind handling the dependencies myself, but there are times when it gets to much when those dependencies requires their own dependencies to be resolved.
No it's not. Slackware users are happy with the package management as it is. I have no need for dependency resolution. Slackware comes with most of the packages I need and anything else I want, I get from SlackBuilds.org and really don't have dependency problems.

I don't think the Slackware team aren't concerned with getting new users; they're happy with the current user base and the user base is happy with the distribution as it is .

As for optimising for better performance: does it really make that much difference? Perhaps for some packages, but I suppose you can always rebuild them for your system if you want. Even though I'm using 32-bit Slackware (with most packages built for i486) on a triple core AMD Phenom CPU, there really aren't performance issues with any of the software I use (general desktop stuff, really). I doubt optimising for i686 or otherwise would make a noticeable difference (to me, at least).
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 12:57 PM   #4
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,972

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
The 32-bit version of Slackware (and there is a 64-bit version...) is optimized to take advantage of every feature that a modern 32-bit CPU has. The fact that it will run on an older CPU does not change this.
 
9 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 02:14 PM   #5
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,134
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank111 View Post
I am a big fan of slackware
If you're such a "big fan", why do you want to make such radical changes to it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank111 View Post
Packages are either optimize for i386 and i486. It's time to get i686 optimized for better performance.

Secondly, it's time for slackware to start doing package dependency handling.
These points have been made and dealt with quite a few times in the Slackware forum. Do a forum search to find out what reception they got.
If you haven't already guessed, I voted NO, NO, NO!!!, but only once.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 02:37 PM   #6
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
I don't use Slackware (Arch here ), but I thought I'd contribute my , since in a way, it can/does apply to Linux distros in general:

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan
The 32-bit version of Slackware (and there is a 64-bit version...) is optimized to take advantage of every feature that a modern 32-bit CPU has. The fact that it will run on an older CPU does not change this.
I always thought that compiling a program for a lower/earlier-model CPU (e.g. 486, early Pentium, etc.) would limit instruction generation to only those that were available on the CPUs of that time (i.e. no MMX/SSE, etc.). I could be wrong, though. :-\
 
Old 09-07-2011, 03:28 PM   #7
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,972

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
The CFLAGS used to build (most of) Slackware's 32-bit packages are:

Code:
-O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686
That's i486-compatible, i686-optimized.
 
8 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 03:57 PM   #8
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
Moved: This thread is more suitable in Slackware and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 04:02 PM   #9
ordinary
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: the Rocket City
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS; in days past Fedora, Solaris, SunOS, 4.2BSD, 4.3BSD, SVR4, AIX, HP-UX
Posts: 101

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am not a Slackware user, but this question (which seems to pop up at about 30Hz) seems analogous ot asking Debian users when Debian will stop all that silly package management.

If you want package management, Slackware may not be your best choice. If you don't want package management, maybe Debian isn't for you.

Find the features you want, then pick a distribution. It is senseless to pick a popular distribution for some arbitrary reason then start lecturing it's devotees on what's wrong with it.
 
6 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 04:03 PM   #10
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,902

Rep: Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963
I resent the suggestion that it isn't modern. But based on your personal definition of modern, I'll answer no.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 04:06 PM   #11
ponce
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,495

Rep: Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912
sorry if I answer with a short movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 04:11 PM   #12
sahko
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,041

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The way you put it, no.
 
Old 09-07-2011, 04:14 PM   #13
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,902

Rep: Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by ordinary View Post
If you want package management, Slackware may not be your best choice.
Slackware does have package management tools. Very nice ones in my opinion. Perhaps the best ones in terms of ease of creation or adjusting packages.

They only thing the native tools don't do is handle dependencies. Though if a user wants that and still wants Slackware because they enjoy other aspects of the distro, there are good third party solutions. Or they can use a derivative distro that has dependency management baked in, again there are several good ones.

I'd suggest to the original poster to take a look at Salix, which is very close to Slackware but uses slapt-get. Perhaps he should choose the x86_64 variant, since he is concerned about compilation being best optimized for the processor.

In fact, this whole poll is kinda stupid. What he wants already exists in related distros. They just aren't called Slackware.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-07-2011, 04:16 PM   #14
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,902

Rep: Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963Reputation: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
sorry if I answer with a short movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
Funny!

I saw another good response in the related videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc

Looking around a bit more, this is also good:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgI2ZQVyrBo

Last edited by ruario; 09-07-2011 at 04:19 PM. Reason: added second link
 
Old 09-07-2011, 04:19 PM   #15
ponce
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,495

Rep: Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912Reputation: 912
proper too, but I like epicness
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Look at what I managed to do today with slackware! cereal83 Slackware 22 04-01-2006 03:41 AM
"computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today." rksprst General 12 02-03-2005 08:25 PM
Slackware 10.0 RC1 Today Released!!!! cHarOn99 Slackware 4 06-16-2004 02:21 PM
Slackware Quirks -- What do you want to see today? Astro Slackware 75 10-24-2003 10:38 AM
Slackware turns 10 years old today! Noryungi Slackware 16 07-20-2003 10:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration