SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Why nobody is surprised that a tool that manages packages depends on a package? I would expect both slackpkg and things like upgradepkg to be as statically linked as possible.
libpng will probably be upgraded hopefully not too far off. The gmp problem is really to do with the order that things are upgraded I think. It doesn't need a new package built but perhaps an extra check in slackpkg to make sure it's upgraded towards the start of the process.
And anyway slackpkg upgrade-all in my opinion is just an added extra convenience. The best way to upgrade would be to keep a mirror locally and use upgradepkg in the correct order I think.
slackpkg and upgradepkg are shell scripts. They can't be statically linked. But they do rely on other tools to work. There's no way to avoid that.
OK AlienBob suggested downgrading libpng to 1.4.0 and that seems to have fixed the icon problem.
Does this mean that it's a bug in 1.4.1 and not just a matter of recompiling the apps against the new library version then?
I'd have thought that as all those new slackware packages have just been rebuilt and linked against 1.4.1, downgrading to 1.4.0 would make matters worse as we'd no longer be running with the library version they were compiled against.
I'm a little confused by this now.
edit:
Just checked the new libpng.slackbuild and if I'm reading between the lines correctly, it sounds like a lot of the new packages were built against 1.4.0 and then libpng was updated after that. If that's so then I'm a little less confused than I was a few minutes ago.
Forget what Eric said. Theres already an updated libpng in -current. Use that one (along with the other updates).
Yep, will do. Thanks Sahko. I spotted mRgOBLIN's post just after I posted that. I'll throw them on tomorrow when they've propagated through the mirrors.
a/coreutils-8.4-i486-2.txz: Rebuilt.
Use --without-gmp, at least for now. We don't want utilities in /bin
requiring a library in /usr/lib{,64} that may not be available.
l/libpng-1.4.1-i486-2.txz: Rebuilt.
Now with less rat.
still have some issue which i assume are related to libpng
i recompiled imlib2 and giblib using the latest slackbuilds but i cannot save png files with scrot (i can save jpg) and i cannot view png files with feh (i can view jpg etc)
Code:
feh WARNING: images/spaceinvaders.png - No Imlib2 loader for that file format
feh - No loadable images specified.
Code:
scrot test.png
giblib error: Saving to file test.png failed
will try to figure out if there are some png specific configure options for either of those that need updating
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.