SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Since I have already recompile a 18.104.22.168 kernel for my 10.0 version it would be safe to say I would go for the 2.6 when I get 11.0 version.I rarely compile a kernel and usually stick with the vanilla version. It might be a bite bloated, but I haven't seen a real increase in performance from the kernel I have recompiled.
Most of the servers I run are at home, so they aren't really that important, but even for a production server I would still keep the original kernels, just for the fact that if a server every did go down because of hardware failure, and you have to migrate it to a new server. There is better chance of being compatible with the new server, this could certainly save some headaches in the future.
I use 2.6.13 since 10.2 all the time in 3+ serves, laptop and homePC
so it stays 2.6 in 11.0 (already installed)
I customize only: low-latency preemptible 250Hz and nosmp...
I leave it i486 and pached with bootsplash (for slackware advertising purposes)... ;-)
I'm long since on 2.6 (since 2.6.0) and i like it for speed, low latency and stability.
I don't thik 2.4 is realy worth to stay in at least 85% of cases: IMHO I would call it outdated rather than confident:
5. various new drivers and patches...
6. it's linux for crying out loud, if we don't test it they won't ever fix it.