LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2005, 04:41 AM   #1
confused_bof
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oz
Distribution: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MythBuntu
Posts: 136

Rep: Reputation: 15
SuSe 9.2 Bouquets and Brickbats


Over the last couple of months I've been trying as many distros as I could lay my hands on. The test system is a 2000+ Athlon, 1G RAM, NVIDEA TNT2, SAMSUNG & LITEON DVD, SOundblaster card, TV/ FM Card, NETGEAR 311T Wireless network card.

Early on I learnt that 'power user' distro means the thing is the barest basic install. Best to have a brick wall handy where you can bang your head in frustration. UBUNTU (?) comes to mind.

FEDORA fell off the list early because its doesn't come with kernel source on the distro. Dial up users like me will find it a nuisance to download 40meg of files that are a bitch to install.

OK, to the point.

Last Friday I installed SuSe 9.2

As far as the install went, brilliant. It did not miss a beat. Detected everything and even set up the NETGEAR card. No other distro I tried did that!

And then it told me it found the TV card!! Again, none of the other distros even got close.

Once into the desktop, I was again impressed.

I was convinced. SuSe 9.2 it is.

And then I went to shut the system down. Every other distro I tried powered the PC down.

But not SuSe. It's supposed, according what I read. It just left a message on the screen that indicated the system was down.

Damn.

What would have been a 10 out of 10 is now an 8 out of 10.

Nevertheless, I am impressed by the hardware detection. All Linux Distros should be this good on setup/ install.
 
Old 04-18-2005, 05:07 AM   #2
abisko00
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3,517

Rep: Reputation: 58
Quote:
It just left a message on the screen that indicated the system was down.
What did the message exactly say? Did it tell it was goint to shutdown, or that it is shut down?

I am not sure if this will have an effect:

In KDE-control center -> System Adminsitration -> Login Manager -> Shutdown, try to change in 'Commands -> Halt' /sbin/halt to /sbin/poweroff
 
Old 04-18-2005, 05:51 AM   #3
confused_bof
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oz
Distribution: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MythBuntu
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by abisko00
What did the message exactly say? Did it tell it was goint to shutdown, or that it is shut down?
AFter the displaying the shutdown sequence log it terminates with the message "The system is down" on a graphic screen.

Quote:

In KDE-control center -> System Adminsitration -> Login Manager -> Shutdown, try to change in 'Commands -> Halt' /sbin/halt to /sbin/poweroff
Yes, I had already tried that, but it didn't make any difference.

No matter, Linux boxes are never switched off anyway, are they?

regards
 
Old 04-18-2005, 05:58 AM   #4
confused_bof
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oz
Distribution: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MythBuntu
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by confused_bof
AFter the displaying the shutdown sequence log it terminates with the message "The system is down" on a graphic screen.



Yes, I had already tried that, but it didn't make any difference.

No matter, Linux boxes are never switched off anyway, are they?

regards
Tried another way:

When in KDE, I log out. Then, when in the (GUI) log in screen, click MENU> TURN OFF COMPUTER.

Same thing- PC is note powered down. Instead I get "The System is down".

I don't think it's my hardware since all the other main stream distros power the PC down OK, ie MDK10.2, FEDORA Core 3, UBUNTU, Debian.
 
Old 04-18-2005, 07:50 AM   #5
abisko00
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3,517

Rep: Reputation: 58
But you didn't install with ACPI off? Strange! Sure there is no acpi=off in /boot/grub/menu.lst?

What happens if you type 'halt -p' on command-line?

EDIT: Did some research and found this: http://portal.suse.com/sdb/en/2002/0..._shutdown.html

Last edited by abisko00; 04-18-2005 at 09:02 AM.
 
Old 04-18-2005, 11:46 PM   #6
confused_bof
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oz
Distribution: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MythBuntu
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by abisko00
But you didn't install with ACPI off? Strange! Sure there is no acpi=off in /boot/grub/menu.lst?
I experimented with ACPI=ON and ACPI=OFF in the boot options. It made no difference.

Quote:

What happens if you type 'halt -p' on command-line?
"command not found"

Quote:

EDIT: Did some research and found this: http://portal.suse.com/sdb/en/2002/0..._shutdown.html
The box is properly configured for a single processor.

Now, in YaST, when I hit the ACPI under POWER MANAGEMENT button I get:

"Buttons can be configured only for ACPI. Your system probably does not support ACPI and uses APM"



Ain't Linux fun? (Please read my signature line).


Thanks
 
Old 04-19-2005, 02:28 AM   #7
abisko00
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3,517

Rep: Reputation: 58
I suggest you screen /var/log/boot.msg for ACPI related errors.

What about powersaved? Is it running (ps ax | grep powersaved)?
 
Old 04-19-2005, 03:09 AM   #8
confused_bof
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oz
Distribution: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, MythBuntu
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by abisko00
I suggest you screen /var/log/boot.msg for ACPI related errors.

What about powersaved? Is it running (ps ax | grep powersaved)?
OK, it's telling me my BIOS is too old. Like me

After a bit of searching I found that "acpi= force" in the boot options will fix the reluctance to power down.

That's fixed it!

Many thanks, all.

Now SuSe 9.2 get's an almost unqualified thumbs up from me. The hardware detection certainly seems second to none.

regards.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual-boot WinXP / Suse 9, keeps crashing after installing Suse MagNiTek Linux - General 2 07-08-2005 12:39 PM
SuSE: Dlink Access Point: How to let SuSE 9.1 box fetch the webpages for wlan request hansschmucker Linux - Wireless Networking 3 01-06-2005 12:02 PM
ATI(fglrx) +suse 9.1 & supplementary drivers from Suse HenrixL Linux - Hardware 0 11-17-2004 04:14 PM
SUSE Security Announcement - cvs (SuSE-SA:2004:008) ima Linux - Security 3 04-19-2004 08:21 PM
SUSE Security Announcement - Linux Kernel (SuSE-SA:2004:009) ima Linux - Security 0 04-19-2004 08:35 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration