SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Do you do a Full or a Customized Slackware installation?
This is part of the ongoing "exploring the Slackware community" series of polls of mine.
When you install Slackware, do you do choose a Full installation or do you prefer a customized one?
If you go customized do you use tagfiles , or some other method?
I do full but not on all sets. I leave off emacs, kde and kdei. But then I remove the odd thing here and there that I consider worthless (such as gxine)
I always do a full install i guess, i only exclude Emacs, is it still a full install then?
Me too (and kdei).
Not so long ago I did a minimal install, but didn't see any advantages in it. I hoped it would be faster, more responsive (left -among others- KDE out).
Didn't notice any speed difference...
I do a full install in 99% of all times on desktops.
When I install a server, it all depends. Most servers I install do not have the 'x' series, neither kde, kdei, emacs.
I voted for 'full install' though, as it is the best option for most users.
I used to do customized installs, but since hd space is cheap and plentiful, I now do full ones.
As previously stated, a full install doesn't compromise speed, since one is still in full control of what processes are running.
I find that with a full install, even though I don't use the KDE desktop, some of its k-apps come in handy every once in a while, so ultimately, there's a time and convenience benefit.
I omit KDEI, but do a "full install" on the other sets. When doing a custom install,
I always get too agressive eliminating things...causing myself a lot of trouble every time!
I always do an full install on my desktop since i got the space and everything for it.
On servers i never do an full install since it's for an specific purpose.
About emacs i install it on my desktops but i never use it.
On older Slackware installs i did customize allot even own kernels but now i don't need that any more.
I only really installed it once, but don't feel the need for Emacs, Tcl/Tk, or TeX. I was going to customize it more, but decided to just install it the easy way. I have plenty of room, but I figured I'd worry about them later if I had a reason to, and I don't think I will any time soon.
I do a full install because I trust Pat and crew. I customize things from there to suit myself, but I figure they know what they're doing and just install what they provide. It's always worked for me.
I never install E, KDEI, T, or Y. And then afterwards add quite a
number of pkgs ... pkgs I build(t), or from Alien Bob's repo. Plus,
for Chinese stuff, I add some nice Mickey$oft fonts, since our
Chinese fonts still aren't so great.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.