UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Its system is beautifully outdated, so I am trying to upgrade it.
I have found several (including official) sites which explain how to do with update-manager. However, my old system does not have modern one, so no sub-menu for system upgrade.
QUESTION
Is it safe to edit apt source files? (jaunty to whatever)
If so, I would not jump release (jaunty -> Karmic -> Maverick...). Is this true?
I would rather try to prepare a new system (on an usb drive) and test it first (as a live CD). But save your important data before installing the new OS.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Rep:
Yes, hardware info is needed here.
While 9.04 was a very nice version it is way out of date.
Upgrading from there is not going to work for a number of reasons. The main is that it is just way too big a jump to any supported ubuntu version.
I have a Dell Latitude that I am not real sure of the date on but it has no wifi but does have built in dialup modem and a dsl port. Obviously not very new. Runs Debian Wheezy fine although rather slow compared to my newer boxes. Works fine if just doing one thing at a time.
The oldest Ubuntu version still supported is 12.04 and it was built on Wheezy when Wheezy was Debian testing. Should be supported until April in 17.
A clean install is really your only reasonable option. You can get a Live CD for 12.04 I am sure and try it.
I would get a couple different "family" members, if I were you, to try if you are sticking with Ubuntu. Lubuntu and possibly Xubuntu will be more responsive on your older hardware. Lubuntu would probably far surpass Xubuntu but either will do better than the Gnome base of Ubuntu even though Xubuntu has way too much in the way of Gnome packages installed on it.
With some actual facts as to the hardware more advice could be given.
like "widget" i still have a working OLD!!! box
One from 2001 that had XP brand spankin new on it ( not a win98 upgrade - than machine self destructed)
but i am in the redhat camp
for that 14 year old computer rhel5.11 and rhel6.6 ( with some hacking run fine)
for the Debian camp
Squeeze still has some support left in it
LTS until 2016
Wheezy ? may or may not work well
like rhel6 you might have to do a few customizing on it
using a older Legacy hardware OS that is STILL SUPPORTED would be a good idea
For some reason, lshw gives me quite non-useful data and hwinfo is missing.
Following some part of data I found.
CPU ARMv7 rev1 800Mhz 32bit
memory 471MiB
5Gig SSD as a main storage
kernel is 2.6.28
wireless interface only. (I cannot find chip detail.)
touchscreen.
bluetooth.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.