LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2015, 02:22 AM   #1
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,834

Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Ubuntu upgrade from 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope)


Hya,

I have an ubuntu system on an unusual hardware.

Its system is beautifully outdated, so I am trying to upgrade it.

I have found several (including official) sites which explain how to do with update-manager. However, my old system does not have modern one, so no sub-menu for system upgrade.

QUESTION
Is it safe to edit apt source files? (jaunty to whatever)
If so, I would not jump release (jaunty -> Karmic -> Maverick...). Is this true?

great thanks in advance

cheers
 
Old 04-03-2015, 02:54 AM   #2
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
I you do a upgrade, save your config files (grub, /etc) and try a new install.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 03:00 AM   #3
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,927

Rep: Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320
I would rather try to prepare a new system (on an usb drive) and test it first (as a live CD). But save your important data before installing the new OS.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 04:59 AM   #4
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
Can you post the hardwareinfo?
 
Old 04-03-2015, 05:50 PM   #5
widget
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
Yes, hardware info is needed here.

While 9.04 was a very nice version it is way out of date.

Upgrading from there is not going to work for a number of reasons. The main is that it is just way too big a jump to any supported ubuntu version.

I have a Dell Latitude that I am not real sure of the date on but it has no wifi but does have built in dialup modem and a dsl port. Obviously not very new. Runs Debian Wheezy fine although rather slow compared to my newer boxes. Works fine if just doing one thing at a time.

The oldest Ubuntu version still supported is 12.04 and it was built on Wheezy when Wheezy was Debian testing. Should be supported until April in 17.

A clean install is really your only reasonable option. You can get a Live CD for 12.04 I am sure and try it.

I would get a couple different "family" members, if I were you, to try if you are sticking with Ubuntu. Lubuntu and possibly Xubuntu will be more responsive on your older hardware. Lubuntu would probably far surpass Xubuntu but either will do better than the Gnome base of Ubuntu even though Xubuntu has way too much in the way of Gnome packages installed on it.

With some actual facts as to the hardware more advice could be given.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 06:33 PM   #6
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,627

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
like "widget" i still have a working OLD!!! box
One from 2001 that had XP brand spankin new on it ( not a win98 upgrade - than machine self destructed)

but i am in the redhat camp

for that 14 year old computer rhel5.11 and rhel6.6 ( with some hacking run fine)


for the Debian camp

Squeeze still has some support left in it
LTS until 2016

Wheezy ? may or may not work well

like rhel6 you might have to do a few customizing on it

using a older Legacy hardware OS that is STILL SUPPORTED would be a good idea
 
Old 04-05-2015, 03:33 AM   #7
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,834

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya

Thanks for posts.

For some reason, lshw gives me quite non-useful data and hwinfo is missing.

Following some part of data I found.

CPU ARMv7 rev1 800Mhz 32bit
memory 471MiB
5Gig SSD as a main storage
kernel is 2.6.28
wireless interface only. (I cannot find chip detail.)
touchscreen.
bluetooth.

I cannot find pci bus. ??? why ???

cheers
 
Old 04-06-2015, 01:59 AM   #8
widget
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
I would be a bit concerned about the pci bus but not until I tried;
Code:
lspci
which should probably also list your wifi.
 
Old 04-08-2015, 02:30 AM   #9
kaz2100
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Penguin land, with apple, no gates
Distribution: SlackWare > Debian testing woody(32) sarge etch lenny squeeze(+64) wheezy .. bullseye bookworm
Posts: 1,834

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Hya,

Yes, I do agree. But life is complicated.
lspci replies "cannot access any working method.

I tried with sudo, and got same result.

cheers
 
Old 04-08-2015, 09:04 PM   #10
widget
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
That doesn't sound good at all.

That is the OS not communicating with the bios correctly.

One or both have some serious problems.
 
  


Reply

Tags
ancient, apt, ubuntu, upgrade



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unable to login a ubuntu 9.04 jaunty jackalope muba Linux - Newbie 3 05-17-2010 07:47 AM
LXer: Upgrade Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope) to Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) Beta LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-12-2009 07:50 AM
LXer: How To Upgrade Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) To 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope) (Desktop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-27-2009 10:50 AM
LXer: Another Look At Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-10-2009 01:50 PM
LXer: Features I’d Like to See in Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope) LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 10-27-2008 06:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration