A file-system defragmentation tool on Linux, please look at here:

1, http://sourceforge.net/projects/defragfs
2, http://defragfs.sourceforge.net

i been using Linux since 2000 and never had to defrag it...

from what i hear Linux does not make a mess out of its file system like windows does...

hi,
there is no need to defrag as we use extents.It simply allocates standard size for each file.So when new file is created , it is done on a new extent and not in the remaining space of other file's extent.when the file is modified or appended it is done on the same or its last extent.So no need to defrag

regards,
Nirmal Tom.

May be you are incorrect.

1, ext2/3 does not use extent on space allocation, ext4dev may add this on the future.

2, Even if you are using a extent-based file system(JFS/XFS/Reiser3,4), have you ever thought on the "Create/Delete/Create..." situation? Something like:
. . . . . . . . . . (10free blocks, each 4KB)
1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 . (you've 5 files allocated "extent", left 1 block)
1 1 . . 3 3 3 . 5 . (delete 2 and 4)
1 1 6 6 3 3 3 6 5 6 (a new file "6" allocates 4 blocks, which does not continuously(3 frags)

3, You may argue that in the upper example, if you've more free space, the file system could allocate the "free-and-continuous" space, which is false. please read here: http://defragfs.sourceforge.net/theory.html

Thanks for the info and link, i did not know about that situation

hi,
nice infn, ya i thought of reiser(ext4 contains it).Even lvm2 uses extents.since extents reduce the amount of fragmentation, i generally and many dont care about it.i will try it and see performance difference.i think it contain some perl scripts for that too.

thanks and regards,
Nirmal Tom.

tmcco,
it's a nice idea, to have a user space fs defrag tool, but I personally don't see a need for it.
1) with *x filesystems being nonfragmenting, there isn't a need to regularly defragment a filesystem.
crashes that cause a hard power off and on to reboot, or power failure are just about the only cause of filesystem fragmentation on *x systems.
2) it has always been recommended to completely rebuild your filesystem every 6 months, so that the .6% fragmentation that may occur in that time gets cleaned up when following recommended procedure.
I know, people just coming to *x from MS' offerings will not know the recommended procedure, they will see a need for and want it, but they will also be rebuilding their system at least monthly until they learn more about *x, so they don't need it either. When they stop rebilding it that often, they will also know it is BEST to actually rebuild the system every six months, problems arising from failure to do so will be their own fault.
[ problems not really likely, I have had systems running various flavours of *x for three years without a single update or issue. ]

1, You said "*x filesystems being nonfragmenting", which I think no one would believe, just look at the example I mentioned before.

2, How do you measure the ".6% fragmentation"? By "guessing"? How could you assure that every *x filesystems would only got ".6% fragmentation" in 6 months?

3, Rebuild is always the best way, I agree.

1, You've never defrag your fs since 2000 does not means that your fs will not fragment.

2, You heard a myth about Linux. How would you evaluate "a mess"? Would a aged ext3 with 23% fragmented files and performance degrade to 60% "a mess"?

Although I do not know anything about the filesystems themselves I must admit I have had no need to defrag any of my filesystems, even after months of hard use (and abuse), some of my machines haven't had a reformat for atleast 2 or 3 years, they still seem to perform the same as they did when they were first installed.

It's often stated that *nix file systems do not fragment the way that Windows file systems do. For some reason people take this to mean the *nix file systems don't fragment at all.. In truth they do just to a lesser extent as the file system does a much better job preventing fragmentation.

http://www2.lut.fi/~ilonen/ext3_fragmentation.html
http://www.itworld.com/Comp/3380/nls...929/index.html

hi,
nice link farslayer and it shows

regards,
Nirmal Tom

"they still SEEM to perform the same as they did when they were first installed"

You may need some data to make your thoughts more persuasively. For example, the output of defragfs.

tmcco,
try running e2fsk* on your e2fs, or reboot 20 to 30 times, your distro will run it automatically, the messages output will tell you how fragmented the particular filesystem is.

*e2fsk is for the ex2fs, ex3fs has a different call to implement it.
just as every other filesystem available for use in any *x can have the filesystem checked and fragmentation amount reported.

the .6% fragmented is the amount my heavily used home partition has shown regularly, throughout the time I have been using linux, even when I did not rebuild the filesystem for 3 years. My minimally altered / partition generally shows a 0.01% fragmentation after a 6 month period, which is the exact same fragmentation level it showed right after the filesytem was created.

Good.

Could you please run "defragfs" on your fs and paste the result?