Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I managed to get 3D working, and the display is correct in Tuxracer, but the normal X display has a widened part near the middle. What might the problem be?
Originally posted by mtb Well, i have posted some messages about the 7000 a pair of years ago and i have noticed i was the only one. Now i'm not .
In fact i have never tried dual screen mode, but i would like to see if i have obtained the max performances from my gfx card ( i'm not at home so i don't remember exactly the results, but i try - and if someone wants the config you have only to ask )
1024x768 @ 16bpp: ~ 600 fps with glxgears.
I have just seen you're using 1280x1024 @ 24bpp, i'll try.
Btw i'm using kernel 2.4.22 ( does it count? ) and a p4 1800
And about the things i can found on source forge dri, can someone tell me if they does speed up things?
Exactly 613.8 fps, with this config ( seems the most tweaked in the device section )
Thank you so very much for all of your assistance!!! I was able to solve
the problem without having to install a new video driver or GLIBC!!! The
problem was with the mouse driver and as I read on the net you can't bring
up X without the mouse!!! You know how you can do a "cat /dev/mouse".
Well, mine did not work as it was mapped to the following
"/dev/mouse -->/dev/input/mice" which was wrong and did not work as I had a PS/2 mouse and needed "/dev/mouse-->/dev/psaux"!!!! When I did a cat /dev/psaux, it worked and I attempted to change in the Config file, but to no avail!!! I decided to take a big leap of faith and reinstall Linux 7.2 entirely and make sure to take the settings that Linux finds and see if it fixes the driver issue and brings up X. Sure enough, I was prompted for PS/2 mouse and then when I tested X, it tested perfectly and booted perfectly as well!!! As I said before, there was no change to the radeon driver (I believe that the 7000 chipset is a few years old so I was lucky here) and the mouse driver was fixed as I had anticipated with the Configuration file reflecting the problem driver initialization sequence. Thank you so very much once again!!!
I've been reading this thread because I just upgraded to a Radeon 7000 card on my machine running Fedora Core 2. Every time I loaded the X server it'd lock the whole machine up in a coma. I finally figured out how to get the damn thing running with the glx option on in the xorg.conf file.
in the xorg.conf file and you're running! I was able to run "glxgears" @ 473 FPS. It also saves me from having to through down a few hundred for a new card. I hope this helps!
What I noticed, was that even with the generic GLX- and DRI-drivers for Radeon 7000 and 7200, Linux would lockup from time to time (just like with ATI's drivers for newer cards, 8500 and newer), at least with 2.6.x-kernels. So I switched those 2 Radeons away too, to GF2 MX, and got rid of all lockups once again. Big thumbs down for ATI again.
Same thing here, but a slightly different angle, my CPU is an overclocked Celeron 600 (running at 900MHz) I get the following:
$ glxgears
disabling TCL support
215 frames in 5.0 seconds = 43.000 FPS
214 frames in 5.0 seconds = 42.800 FPS
214 frames in 5.0 seconds = 42.800 FPS
215 frames in 5.0 seconds = 43.000 FPS
Broken pipe <----------- I killed it here
Now the question - given the low spec of my processor should I be expecting better than 43 fps when running glxgears in fullscreen at 1280x1024? System info follows...
It looks like this is a thread dedicated to the awful Radeon 7000. so let me tel lmy stories too!
Have a Radeon 7000, works fine under windows. works like crap under linux. I'm running slackware 9.1, kernel 2.4.26. I can get dri enabled, but when I run glxgears, I can't seem to get more than ~300 fps. I have a P4 2.6GHZ, w/512 RAM and I think I should be able to get more than 300 fps. I have no idea why I can't. I've tried a number of suggestions on this page, including the
"Option "AGPMode" "4"
Option "ForcePCIMode" "YES"
(these two were new to me) but they didn't work. actually the second one appears in my log file as a warning that this option is not being used. so I'm not sure why this would help some people who are using an AGP card
The only useful information I can find in my XFree86.0.log is
(WW) (1400x1050,monitor) mode clock 122MHz exceeds DDC maximum 110MHz
which probably won't have an effect because I don't run my monitor at that resolution anyway and
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] failure adding irq handler, there is a device already using that irq
[drm] falling back to irq-free operation
but I have no idea what this means.
No one on the dri mailing list has had any really useful suggestions for a while. I've come to the conclusion that the support for this card generally sucks, and that there really isn't much that can be done except endless hourse of tweeking settings and compiling/installing new drivers andpraying, or getting a new card. Can anyone recommend a good card out there, which is known to work VERY WELL? something midrange, 256-512 RAM on the card would be good.....
Last edited by Lord Zoltar; 08-24-2004 at 11:16 PM.
Originally posted by Lord Zoltar Can anyone recommend a good card out there, which is known to work VERY WELL? something midrange, 256-512 RAM on the card would be good.....
Just pick up the fastest nVidia-card you can afford.
I've never had a single problem with GeForce-cards (installed 10+ to Linux, GF2, GF3, GF4). Can't say that about ATI...
paths are relative to Debian...I'm a noob so I have no clue if these paths are global throughout distro's...
Hey,
I found a config. somewhere(?-I forget where exactly and if anyone recognize's it, I would like to say thank you very MUCH!) that gives this output for glxinfo:
Direct Rendering: Yes
Firstly, Maybe Klaus-the guy who release's knoppix distro's has this built into the install and other distributions, such as Red Hat or Mandrake or Suse, will need to install software or do MORE configurations than I have done-I don't suppose it would hurt to back up your exisiting XF86Config-4 file and try these settings.
I am using a knoppix distro , 3.6 (Debian 3.3 Linux 2.4.7 I beleive...I'm a noob so don't quote me here...), and I have only changed the XF86Config-4 file to match some suggestions on another Linux Site(again, I forget which one exactly: Might even have been this one :-), I've pasted the output of glxinfo and glxgears below this rambling. I will have to say that the re-configuration doesn't seem to have made much of a difference in speed between the standard vesa driver....it also seems to be running at AGP 1x while the card itself is capable of AGP 4x...and below that the relevant sections of the XF86Config-4 showing my changes....
==================================================
i have similar problem getting some kind of direct 3d acceleration with my radeon igp320m in compaq notebook.. i'm running mandrake 10.. anyone know anything?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.