Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Are you for or against systemd?
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Original Poster
Rep:
VERY interesting! Now, let's expand the discussion, if you don't care much for systemd (and/or voted "HATE IT!" or "Don't like it, prefer a different one!"), which one would you prefer?? (if any at all) runit, upstart, or something else?? And maybe why??
PS. I'm glad I'm notsystemd's developers, as no one at this point seems to have a strong opinion in favor of it!
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,498
Rep:
If it were just another init system, there would have been no outcry, but it is not, it is being integrated into other programs, causing a lot of bother to people who like 'freedom', whether you are for it or not, you can see that for your self.
Personally, I like the unix way of doing things, & will continue to support those who continue along this line.
It is just meaning that the original "Unix philosophy" is no longer existing in today's Linuxcommunity.
The today's Linux community is not congruent at all.
So, let's take a simple programmer example. Are you ready?
GTK is today classic and standard, right? Compiling this will cause in interesting results on your installation.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
autopoint build-essential debhelper dpkg-dev fakeroot gettext gir1.2-atk-1.0
gir1.2-freedesktop gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0 gir1.2-glib-2.0 gir1.2-gtk-2.0
gir1.2-pango-1.0 intltool-debian libalgorithm-diff-perl
libalgorithm-diff-xs-perl libalgorithm-merge-perl libasprintf-dev
libatk1.0-dev libcairo-script-interpreter2 libcairo2-dev libdpkg-perl
libfakeroot libfile-fcntllock-perl libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev libgettextpo-dev
libgettextpo0 libgirepository-1.0-1 libgtk2.0-dev libharfbuzz-dev
libharfbuzz-gobject0 liblzo2-2 libmail-sendmail-perl libpango1.0-dev
libpixman-1-dev libsys-hostname-long-perl libxcb-shm0-dev libxcomposite-dev
libxcursor-dev libxi-dev libxml2-utils libxrandr-dev po-debconf
x11proto-composite-dev x11proto-randr-dev
0 upgraded, 44 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 14.3 MB of archives.
After this operation, 45.3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
As I said in another thread – the things that were true on an isolated 1970's minicomputer ... and, I was there ... are not today sacrosanct. Neither is the deployment situation the same. Today, a single large company might run hundreds or even thousands of Linux machines. They have to be able to control them remotely and to make them function as a distributed-computing unit. "systemd" was specifically conceived with these new operational requirements in mind.
If you can't conceive of a world without inittab and crontab with which to run your one Linux machine, there's no one stopping you ... even today ... from running your one Linux machine that way. But there was a reason for the various architectural decisions that the other teams made in constructing "systemd." And, there was a strongly perceived market demand, as seen by the various Linux distro author teams, to adopt it. They didn't do it out of reasons of conspiracy. They did it because they perceived that their customers demanded it.
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 04-17-2017 at 09:05 AM.
Sorry guys, this Systemd is adopted by most distros. This is a sane decision, otherwise, Linux distros would not be in favor of it.
If you are not happy of today's Linux, you can make your own distro or can anytime rewrite another Unix-like operating system. This time, you could make it really GNU, free, and without all those necessary libs for graphical apps; besides, you may remove java, perl, python, mono,...
Besides, good luck to compile anything from scratch, since many libs are require
This is why people should re-think about X11 and Motif or the ugly simplicity.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.