Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm unable to use a higher resolution than 1024x768 with the "radeon" driver.
My system is an x86 with GNU/Linux Slackware 12.2, it has a Radeon Xpress 200 integrated graphics card.
If I attempt to use the "vesa" driver I get no usable screens.
If I attempt to use the proprietary ATI driver the entire system will crash -- the display turns black, and the computer freezes, I'm assuming this is due to a kernel panic. I've tried at least 5 different driver versions of the proprietary ATI driver, none work so far.
The computer works perfectly fine in every other regard.
When I try to force X to use 1280x1024 I get in the Xorg.log:
"(EE) RADEON(0): Using VGA default."
Attached here is my dmesg, Xorg.log and xorg.conf files:
use modelines and write better screen and monitor sections first
That's nonsense, since XFree86 >= 4.0 modelines are calculated automatically upon startup.
What else needs to be "better" in the screen and monitor section?
By the way, I think you are wrong about modelines and Xorg... I never let it detect anything about the monitor (on a KVM switch) and use modelines without using the extra option: NoDDC
Alright gentlemen,
if you're saying that modelines is what I'm supposed to use to make this work -- then why does it work automatically by itself when I installed a PCI-E Nvidia Geforce 6600 GT card?
With this card I'm running perfectly fine in 1280x1024, no modelines.
Why won't you simply admit that the radeon and fglrx drivers are just completely fucked up for some cards -- i.a. the Xpress 200?
the Nvidia installer for GNU/Linux is just fantastic -- there are so many issues it can just solve on its own, on the fly, it is so intuitive and easy to use, and most important of all, it simply just _works_.
ATI on the other hand, well, I've tried nearly every version of that driver and none worked, all of them made X crash and/or the kernel panic.
Xpress 200 = RS400/RS480 ...for these radeon should work. I had used RV5** and RV670 with radeon/fglrx too on Slamd64-12.1 with no problems. Yes I did use a few options for the driver.
The latest fglrx is known to cause problems/not work with some older cards.
You should use modelines and xorg.conf only when you have suboptimal performance.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.