GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I don't know. I guess it's not difficult. Each time a supercomputer is ordered by a university/organisation, the specs (+OS ) are recorded (?)
You can get more info here: http://www.top500.org/
Having looked at the FAQ, it seems that it works slightly differently. Each organisation who wants to have their supercomputer listed needs to submit the data.
I guess that despite 95% the market being M$, 99.999% of the TFlops of computing power, are *nix...
This composition is limited to the top 500 list. I read somewhere that one single zombie network in some cases would enter the topp 500 list if it used all available power on number crunching. I can't remember where I read it, but with some multiple times 10.000 computers in one network, it seems plausible (to me). And that's only the infected machines. And there is A LOT of windows machines out there. So if you include the whole market (all desktop machines), I would guess windows would be superior again.
On another note, I wonder when we will see Sony playstation on the list. Some scientist found out that you could build a great super computer cluster for a fraction of the price if you made a cluster of PS3 running linux.
Some scientist found out that you could build a great super computer cluster for a fraction of the price if you made a cluster of PS3 running linux.
Not after recent PS3 updates - they disabled the possibility of running linux on it
Quote:
This composition is limited to the top 500 list. I read somewhere that one single zombie network in some cases would enter the topp 500 list if it used all available power on number crunching. I can't remember where I read it, but with some multiple times 10.000 computers in one network, it seems plausible (to me). And that's only the infected machines. And there is A LOT of windows machines out there. So if you include the whole market (all desktop machines), I would guess windows would be superior again.
IMHO, I think you've missed the point it's completely irrelevant. 90% of those top 500 supercomputers run linux because they want something rock-solid, secure and stable.
90% of the zombie supercomputers run windows because it's not secure, buggy and easy to hijack.
You can't compare those two categories of supercomputers, IMO.
Not after recent PS3 updates - they disabled the possibility of running linux on it
Oh, thats right. Bastards.
Quote:
IMHO, I think you've missed the point it's completely irrelevant. 90% of those top 500 supercomputers run linux because they want something rock-solid, secure and stable.
90% of the zombie supercomputers run windows because it's not secure, buggy and easy to hijack.
You can't compare those two categories of supercomputers, IMO.
Yes, I get that. I was just commenting on Alexvaders post, but perhaps I misunderstood him.
I guess that despite 95% the market being M$, 99.999% of the TFlops of computing power, are *nix...
I wouldn't be so sure. How much computing power the world has, and what sort of systems it's on, is a question that I don't think has really been looked at.
IIRC on the Folding@Home stats the Linux client 'punches above its weight', (there are 9 times as many Windows clients which produce only 5x as much performance) perhaps because GNU/Linux is a common choice for dedicated folding boxes some people have. On the other hand there's no Linux GPU client yet (the Windows one does run under Wine but can conflict with other usage of the GPU). Easily most of FAH's power comes from GPU and PS3 clients.
That said, the Linux Folding@Home clients alone would make the Top500, ranking around 130th.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.