LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices

Tags used in this thread
Popular LQ Tags , , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2008, 04:42 PM   #1
captainxark
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Hawaii
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 17
Thanked: 0
Exclamation gparted says my main partition isn't formatted???


[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
[Fedora 8 XFCE on Compaq Evo 610]

Was formatting a memory stick and noticed that it says the bulk of my hard drive is not formatted. (!)

sda2 has the orange triangle with black exclamation point and when I get information it says that it has unknown file type and is unmounted.

Meanwhile my boot partition is only 200mb and only has 25mb used and i've been installing quite a few things.

df -h:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
36G 6.9G 30G 19% /
/dev/sda1 190M 19M 162M 11% /boot
tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm

I'm pretty sure tmpfs is the flash drive I'm working on.

How did I get through an XFCE installation without a real partition for SDA2?

It's my root (/) drive but it isn't mounted?
captainxark is offline  
Tag This Post , , , ,
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 06:27 PM   #2
TITiAN
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: NRW, Germany
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux, Xfce+Compiz
Posts: 289
Thanked: 21
Quote:
df -h:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
36G 6.9G 30G 19% /
/dev/sda1 190M 19M 162M 11% /boot
tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm
obviously, the root partition is not sda2 but /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
tmpfs is a virtual partition in your RAM
df -h doesn't say anything about sda2, but maybe df -ha will do (if sda2 is formatted)

anything i can help with?
TITiAN is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 09:33 PM   #3
captainxark
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Hawaii
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 17
Thanked: 0

Original Poster
but why does gparted not recognize it?

Thanks for shedding some light, but the question remains.

Is there any disadvantage to having a name like that instead of sda2?
captainxark is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 07:03 AM   #4
TITiAN
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: NRW, Germany
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux, Xfce+Compiz
Posts: 289
Thanked: 21
Since it is the root partition, I think there isn't. Other devices, like the CD/DVD drive or partable storage might be used from command line (e.g. dd if=/dev/cdrom of=~/image.iso should make an image of a CD). If other people administrate your PC, they might get confused at first. But I think, that's about all the disadvantages.
TITiAN is offline     Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error trying to resize NTFS partition with Gparted mistere29 Linux - Newbie 6 06-14-2009 06:20 PM
How can I create extended partition without GParted? alan_ri Linux - Hardware 27 02-10-2008 07:31 PM
Gparted for a new partition mcbenus Linux - Software 10 09-09-2007 09:37 PM
redimension a ntfs partition using gparted htamayo Linux - Software 1 04-12-2007 11:55 AM
gparted destroyed partition table orionp31 Linux - Newbie 5 02-04-2007 11:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration