unstable system after using slackpkg current
2 Attachment(s)
I did a fresh install of slackware 14.2 and decided to try the current branch, i have been experiencing some issues that i can not fix on my own, some of the issues are
1. The day before yesterday i ran a virus scan in the morning it took 45 min, yesterday i ran the same scan but it hadnt finish after 5hrs so i had to cancel it 2. I received a message that irq19 had been disabled or shutdown, i found out that irq is tied to my network card, all i did was change from network manager to dchp and it seems tofix the issue 3. Yesterday when i was trying to shutdown my conputer thru xfce it took maybe 2 mintues to display the different logout options and then got an error message, see picture 4. Have more than once been unable to iniciate xfce 5. When ever i run under root netconfig, mkinit generator, etc the windows appera like my picture I pretty sure all of this issues have occured after using the current branch updates, unless my computer has been compromised which in either case i really dont know were to start, i have looked at the syslog but honestly dont know what to mAke of it. I'm not to sure if it my ssd, its not even a year old, any help would be appreciated. I was wondering if maybe by any chance someone locally could help me |
How did you perform upgrade on your machine?
Did you install the new packages and merge all new configs? Note that current is now set to use UTF-8 if you are planning to use -current, probably it's better to use -current ISO generated by AlienBOB see here: http://bear.alienbase.nl/mirrors/sla...4-current-iso/ |
Also, did you update 14.2 before moving to --Current?
|
Quote:
One quick question i have is in previous installs what i have done before checking for updates is create a non-root use then use SU to run all the commands but this time i logged in as root is that an issue? To answer frankbell question: i would say no based on my respond to willsyr |
No, it doesn't make any difference in terms of creating users for performing updates.
It does make difference if you are running normal users on daily activities Did you run these 2 commands on your upgrade procedure? Code:
slackpkg install-new |
Quote:
|
yes, you still do it now
basically it just removed packages no longer included in the -current, although i don't think it has any effect on your stability. |
Quote:
Export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Export LC_COLLATE=C For the install-new command it installed - gcc.brig-7-1.0...... - lame-3.99.5....... - urw-core35-fonts..... For the clean-system command it removed maybe 80 applications If you don't think the clean-system command might fix the stability is there something else i should try? |
I would go with a fresh -current ISO generated by AlienBOB i mentioned on my first reply
|
Quote:
|
I used the same procedure on a VM, but i didn't get the same behaviour as you did, so i can't give a detailed answer about that.
I also followed current on my desktop, laptop and workstation and everything works well too. Starting from a fresh installation is just one solution. You can also try to reinstall all slackware packages by running Code:
slackpkg reinstall slackware64 |
I recently upgraded an up to date install of Slackware64 14.2 to Slackware64-current. Here are the commands I ran after uncommenting one mirror for slackware64-current.
# slackpkg update gpg # slackpkg update # slackpkg install-new # slackpkg upgrade-all # slackpkg clean-system |
Quote:
I do have another question and i hope u can answer or someone else, my question is: In terms of exploits is running current updates far more secure than running stable updates? I read all the time "keep ur system up to date" so does that mean use current as default? For example stable Firefox is usually a couple revs behind current, so is othet libraries like openssl an other ones i saw |
Quote:
Slackpkg update gpg Slackpkg update Slackpkg upgrade-all Slackpkg install-new And maybe the clean-system But know that i know the proper sequence ill write them down |
Quote:
-stable is designed to maintain backward compatibility, so not all new version gets backported to -stable. Only security fixes or an important patches that goes into -stable. As for Firefox case, -stable received ESR version, which is maintained for a long time instead of following latest version that might *surprise* people with their new features. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM. |