LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   LQ Suggestions & Feedback (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/lq-suggestions-and-feedback-7/)
-   -   "Quick Links" and Google APIs (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/lq-suggestions-and-feedback-7/quick-links-and-google-apis-789379/)

catkin 02-16-2010 12:29 AM

"Quick Links" and Google APIs
 
Hello :)

Today the "Quick Links" button sometimes does not give the usual drop down menu but changes the main menu bar (to include "New Posts"). Once (no longer) "New Posts" required Google APIs.

Given the choice I would prefer not to have to enable Google APIs to use LQ. I run NoScript in Firefox (3.5.3) and am able to use LQ without enabling any of the domains listed except linuxquestions.org. Would be nice if things stayed that way.

EDIT: just noticed Google APIs have to be enabled for the "B" (bolden) button to work now :(

Best

Charles

jeremy 02-16-2010 08:48 AM

We've been testing using the hosted version of YUI on both Google and Yahoo for performance reasons. I've switched it back to an LQ hosted version for now, but can't 100% guarantee it will stay that way long term.

--jeremy

GrapefruiTgirl 02-16-2010 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catkin (Post 3865195)
Given the choice I would prefer not to have to enable Google APIs to use LQ. I run NoScript in Firefox (3.5.3) and am able to use LQ without enabling any of the domains listed except linuxquestions.org. Would be nice if things stayed that way.

++++1 from me. And for the last few days, I was blaming my browser :/ when the [tags] buttons weren't working!

Sasha

smeezekitty 02-16-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Given the choice I would prefer not to have to enable Google APIs to use LQ. I run NoScript in Firefox (3.5.3) and am able to use LQ without enabling any of the domains listed except linuxquestions.org. Would be nice if things stayed that way.
Why?

catkin 02-16-2010 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smeezekitty (Post 3865793)
Why?

Simplicity, performance and privacy.

jeremy 02-16-2010 01:16 PM

FWIW, while I do agree with the privacy aspect, simplicity and performance would dictate going with the hosted solution. Hundreds of thousands of sites use the YUI javascript framework. Each site serving their own copy when there's a centrally located version available from the project maintainers that is minified and high cached is fairly inefficient (which doesn't even address issues such as security patches being applied very quickly to the central version and who knows when to some of the local versions). I'm still very open to feedback on this topic though.

--jeemy

DragonSlayer48DX 02-17-2010 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremy (Post 3865921)
FWIW, while I do agree with the privacy aspect...

That should be enough to keep it the way it is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremy (Post 3865921)
...simplicity and performance would dictate going with the hosted solution.

I beg to differ, there. The only performance issue I encounter is when my browser is re-directed from the immediate page I'm viewing with my oldest (PIII) PC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremy (Post 3865921)
I'm still very open to feedback on this topic though.

Thankfully. ;)

-1 for changing. Just my :twocents:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.