Debian minimal install LXDE or Openbox
Hi,
I am currently running Debian Wheezy with XFCE installed from a Debian Live ISO I am thinking of replacing this with a minimal install and adding LXDE or alternatively no DE but using Openbox window manager (as done in Crunchbang). I am trying to get as light as I can but without losing too much functionality . I am going to follow the instructions here //http://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/lightweight-debian-lxde-desktop-from-scratch/ Does anyone have any advice as to which option might be better ? Pros/ cons etc Eireannach |
If you want to have that full DE experience, then go for LXDE.
When I want light, I go OpenBox. You don't get all that call DE stuff like a main menu and a task bar, but that's not really a deal breaker for me. The OpenBox menu is a right click on the desktop (sure, if you have windows minimized, that may be a problem but a keybinding could fix that), and as far as switching windows, IMHO Alt=Tab is faster than using a task bar. If you need the notification area and such, you could probably do them as well without a panel as well. |
The laptop I did this on still sits on the shelf. Not touched for months. It was done more as a self teaching experiment than as a working install environment.
I still use the M/C shop Computer though. I got rid of lXpanels on it though and went back to straight fluxbox on it with KDE-Lite as a alternative Desktop environment to boot into via Slim Login Manager. It took me some troubleshooting to get LXDE the way I wanted it. I pretty much took that trail alone without help. http://forum.lxde.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31202 A AntiX core install is like a Debian net install. In practice and uses Debian repos. |
You don't need to start over from scratch. You can simply:
Code:
apt-get install lxde Code:
apt-get install openbox |
If you want to go even lighter than LXDE or Openbox, you might consider one of the LinuxBBQ releases. "Cream" was just released, featuring 76 window managers (and it still fits on a CD!).
|
I personally would just go for Openbox, then pick from LXDE what you might need to get a better experience (themeswitcher, power-manager, ...).
But it depends highly on how you use your system and how you define lightweight. For example, if you use Vim or Gvim asd texteditor you don't have a need for LXDE's text editor, if you use Xterm or Urxvt for terminal emulation you won't need LXDE's LXTerm, ... . Not installing that software will make your system smaller on the disk, but will have no advantage in memory usage, since software that doesn't run doesn't need resources. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The meta package for OpenBox is pretty plane. I personally have used the Debian version of Lxde, pretty much as it comes from the Lxde folks. May be better now but I prefer OpenBox with the Tint2 panel. Tint2 is kind of a pain to set up until you find the tools. Be sure to install the debian menu package as this will save you from having to edit the OB menu. This is not hard to do but if you have not used OB before it may leave a bad taste. OB is a vastly under rated and under used system. I prefer Xfce myself but if they get as crazed as, for instance, KDE has always been and Gnome has become, I will have OB on in a hurry. A good place to see a very nice OTB OpenBox install is to get a CD from Manjaro (Arch based). They configure a very nice OpenBox and you can see the tools they provide for it and Tint2. These are native tools to both of them. Lxde is a nice attempt to build a DE out of OpenBox. Comes across, to me, as simply a bloated OpenBox. |
OpenBox. :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Code:
Components With the switch to LXQt it will become components that are now missing, like lxqt-powermanagement (which by the way works fine without LXQt). LXDE/LXQt is indeed a fully blown DE, not just a WM with panels. |
Most of the accessories will be added to a WM by a user. Most people will add things like image viewer, editor and audio player. Who would not install a terminal? Although every OS, no matter how minimal, will include one.
Nothing special in the system tools "Core components." Again most Openbox users will install a panel and file manager, so nothing special there. In conclusion; other than a few extra themes provided by LXAppearance, LXDE does not have much more than a stand alone Openbox. All they did was create a new panel and add desktop icons, which anyone can do. |
So all the applications written by them are not more than a panel an desktop icons because the user has options to add something else to a WM? In that view DEs simply don't exist, even KDE has nothing that couldn't be done by a third parts app. Sorry, but I don't buy that.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM. |