DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am currently running Debian Wheezy with XFCE installed from a Debian Live ISO
I am thinking of replacing this with a minimal install and adding LXDE or alternatively no DE but using Openbox window manager (as done in Crunchbang). I am trying to get as light as I can but without losing too much functionality . I am going to follow the instructions here //http://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/lightweight-debian-lxde-desktop-from-scratch/
Does anyone have any advice as to which option might be better ? Pros/ cons etc
If you want to have that full DE experience, then go for LXDE.
When I want light, I go OpenBox. You don't get all that call DE stuff like a main menu and a task bar, but that's not really a deal breaker for me. The OpenBox menu is a right click on the desktop (sure, if you have windows minimized, that may be a problem but a keybinding could fix that), and as far as switching windows, IMHO Alt=Tab is faster than using a task bar. If you need the notification area and such, you could probably do them as well without a panel as well.
The laptop I did this on still sits on the shelf. Not touched for months. It was done more as a self teaching experiment than as a working install environment.
I still use the M/C shop Computer though. I got rid of lXpanels on it though and went back to straight fluxbox on it with KDE-Lite as a alternative Desktop environment to boot into via Slim Login Manager.
It took me some troubleshooting to get LXDE the way I wanted it. I pretty much took that trail alone without help.
If you want to go even lighter than LXDE or Openbox, you might consider one of the LinuxBBQ releases. "Cream" was just released, featuring 76 window managers (and it still fits on a CD!).
I personally would just go for Openbox, then pick from LXDE what you might need to get a better experience (themeswitcher, power-manager, ...).
But it depends highly on how you use your system and how you define lightweight. For example, if you use Vim or Gvim asd texteditor you don't have a need for LXDE's text editor, if you use Xterm or Urxvt for terminal emulation you won't need LXDE's LXTerm, ... . Not installing that software will make your system smaller on the disk, but will have no advantage in memory usage, since software that doesn't run doesn't need resources.
I am currently running Debian Wheezy with XFCE installed from a Debian Live ISO
I am thinking of replacing this with a minimal install and adding LXDE or alternatively no DE but using Openbox window manager (as done in Crunchbang). I am trying to get as light as I can but without losing too much functionality . I am going to follow the instructions here //http://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/lightweight-debian-lxde-desktop-from-scratch/
Does anyone have any advice as to which option might be better ? Pros/ cons etc
Eireannach
If you really want a mininal install, use debootstrap with the --variant=minbase option. I was able to get a Debian install with Fluxbox and some other basic tools under 275MiB.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine
You don't need to start over from scratch. You can simply:
Code:
apt-get install lxde
or:
Code:
apt-get install openbox
Now you can choose LXDE or Openbox from your login screen.
This is not needed. Lxde is based on OpenBox. Install Lxde and you will have the choice of Lxde or OpenBox at login in the sessions list already.
The meta package for OpenBox is pretty plane.
I personally have used the Debian version of Lxde, pretty much as it comes from the Lxde folks. May be better now but I prefer OpenBox with the Tint2 panel.
Tint2 is kind of a pain to set up until you find the tools.
Be sure to install the debian menu package as this will save you from having to edit the OB menu. This is not hard to do but if you have not used OB before it may leave a bad taste.
OB is a vastly under rated and under used system. I prefer Xfce myself but if they get as crazed as, for instance, KDE has always been and Gnome has become, I will have OB on in a hurry.
A good place to see a very nice OTB OpenBox install is to get a CD from Manjaro (Arch based). They configure a very nice OpenBox and you can see the tools they provide for it and Tint2. These are native tools to both of them.
Lxde is a nice attempt to build a DE out of OpenBox. Comes across, to me, as simply a bloated OpenBox.
OB is a vastly under rated and under used system. I prefer Xfce myself but if they get as crazed as, for instance, KDE has always been and Gnome has become, I will have OB on in a hurry.
And nothing stops you from using the two together, for the time being. I used to use OB on top of XFCE at work on a P4, very nice experience.
Precisely. LXDE is little more than Openbox with a panel and desktop icons.
To be fair, LXDE is much more than just a panel and icons:
Code:
Components
Core desktop components
PCManFM, a fast and lightweight file manager with features like Drag & Drop support, tabbed browsing (Similar to Firefox), Built-in file searching utility, fast load of large directories, File association support (Default application), Thumbnail for image files, bookmarks support, correct handling of non-UTF-8 encoded filenames and more. It's based on libfm.
libfm, A glib/gio-based library providing some file management utilities and related-widgets missing in gtk+/glib. This is the core of PCManFM. The library is desktop independent (not LXDE specific) and has clean API. It can be used to develop other applications requiring file management functionality. For example, you can create your own file manager with facilities provided by libfm.
LXLauncher, an easy-mode application launcher for small screens
LXPanel, desktop panel. The panel can generate a menu for installed applications automatically from *.desktop files. It can be configured from GUI preference dialog, and there is no need to edit config files. The component provides a "Run" dialog with autocompletion.
LXSession, a session manager, is used to automatically start a set of applications and set up a working desktop environment. Moreover, the session manager is able to remember the applications in use when a user logs out and to restart them the next time the user logs in.
LXSession Edit, an edit manager for session management. The window manager in use in LXDE can be changed, the tool offers the ability to turn on disabled applications.
Openbox, a window manager and obconf
libmenu-cache a library used to loading freedesktop.org spec complaint desktop menu. It creates some on-disk caches to speed up loading.
LXMenu Data, a collection of files, intended to adapt LXDE menus to the freedesktop.org menu specification. The data can be used in conjunction with libmenu-cache.
Accessories
Leafpad, a text editor
Xarchiver, archiving
GPicView, a fast and intuitive image viewer.
LXTerminal, a terminal emulator
LXMusic, a minimalist xmms2-based music player
LXFind, a search program
Galculator, a lightweight yet powerful calculator
System Tools
LXTask, a task manager and system monitor
LXDM, a lightweight display manager used for logging in
Configuration Tools
LXAppearance, a theme switcher. You can change the theme, icons, and fonts used by applications easily.
LXRandr, a screen manager. Manages screen resolution and external monitors.
LXShortCut, an easy way to edit application shortcuts
LXInput, a config tool to configure your keyboard and mouse under LXDE
LXDE Common, the default settings configuration file for integrating the different components of LXDE. LXDE Common manages the system behavior and functions to integrate icons and artwork.
With the switch to LXQt it will become components that are now missing, like lxqt-powermanagement (which by the way works fine without LXQt). LXDE/LXQt is indeed a fully blown DE, not just a WM with panels.
Most of the accessories will be added to a WM by a user. Most people will add things like image viewer, editor and audio player. Who would not install a terminal? Although every OS, no matter how minimal, will include one.
Nothing special in the system tools
"Core components." Again most Openbox users will install a panel and file manager, so nothing special there.
In conclusion; other than a few extra themes provided by LXAppearance, LXDE does not have much more than a stand alone Openbox. All they did was create a new panel and add desktop icons, which anyone can do.
So all the applications written by them are not more than a panel an desktop icons because the user has options to add something else to a WM? In that view DEs simply don't exist, even KDE has nothing that couldn't be done by a third parts app. Sorry, but I don't buy that.
This is not needed. Lxde is based on OpenBox. Install Lxde and you will have the choice of Lxde or OpenBox at login in the sessions list already.
I gave the OP both commands so they can choose. Apologies for not explicitly mentioning that "LXDE is based on Openbox, so it is redundant to install Openbox if you already have LXDE."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
