LinuxQuestions.org
Page 6 of 8 « First 45 6 78
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2008-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-83/)
-   -   Browser of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2008-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-83/browser-of-the-year-695619/)

bluecog6 02-04-2009 06:33 PM
I don't think that Google is out to get Mozilla/Firefox, but I really like the Chrome beta, and I think it'll give Firefox and Opera a run for their money.

I voted Firefox though.

dora 02-05-2009 04:33 AM
Firefox, followed by Seamonkey.

sunwards 02-07-2009 02:50 PM
If only Konqueror and Opera didn't crash that much because of flash/or flash didn't crash within them... I vote Iceweasel.

I was testing Arora a couple of days ago, but side by side rendering when scrolling of gmail with it and Iceweasel, says it all for now.

ryj_cube 02-08-2009 07:37 PM
Chrome!!!! Even Conan agrees... although Crom is his way of saying it.

antivirus 02-10-2009 02:21 AM
Firefox indeed.

sandyssn 02-10-2009 04:44 AM
hail firefox :p

dora 02-13-2009 04:04 PM
I would have expected more votes for SeaMonkey.

linuxlover.chaitanya 02-13-2009 10:49 PM
Was an expected result.

sycamorex 02-14-2009 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dora (Post 3442733)
I would have expected more votes for SeaMonkey.
Yeah, I agree. Although I voted for FF, Seamonkey would be my second choice.

Mega Man X 02-14-2009 06:29 AM
Voted for Firefox, again, because of the addons. If I had to use FF without the addons, I simply wouldn't. But I am glad to see that Opera got a distant second place. I think Opera could possibly be the most underrated piece of software of all times.

fritz_p 02-14-2009 12:45 PM
seamonkey on second... konqueror on...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamorex (Post 3443179)
Yeah, I agree. Although I voted for FF, Seamonkey would be my second choice.
The point is that we where not voting for the second choice. When I looked at seamonkey it seamed to me that it was kind of like firefox, which is fine, but I already had FF, so that was it.
There are several good choices so you have to have something special to attract new users.

The question now is, why are the K-developers still sticking to konqueror as default?

Mega Man X 02-14-2009 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritz_p (Post 3443432)
The question now is, why are the K-developers still sticking to konqueror as default?
Integration, for sure. Konqueror integrates very well with KDE. It is also a very nice browser, with lots of potential.

gotfw 02-14-2009 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritz_p (Post 3443432)
The point is that we where not voting for the second choice. When I looked at seamonkey it seamed to me that it was kind of like firefox, which is fine, but I already had FF, so that was it.
There are several good choices so you have to have something special to attract new users.

The question now is, why are the K-developers still sticking to konqueror as default?
Probably for same reason Gnome is sticking with Epiphany, and Xfce is in process of developing Midori. Each of which integrates nicely with existing gtk and qt toolkits.

tayyabrana 02-15-2009 01:22 PM
Simply Fire Fox,as fire fox is my companion for many years now.

priyaunni 02-22-2009 09:27 AM
I am so much in love with Firefox 3!
:)

debian


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.
Page 6 of 8 « First 45 6 78
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page