ReaperX7 |
05-20-2013 09:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by caravel
(Post 4953048)
I'm not exactly a fan of the gentleman in question, his ideas or his software, but this kind of excessively personal, if not defamatory, rhetoric reflects badly on us as Slackware users.
|
I wasn't the one who got on an interview and stated after I was told "Slackware hasn't accepted systemd, yet", with the narcissist-egocentrically comment, "Oh God..." as if Slackware, the oldest currently maintained distribution of Linux, turned down "God's gift" to Linux. Lennart put the knife to our throats first buddy, so it was only fair we get to baseball bat him in the nads as needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium
The only common denominator among Slackware users is that they use Slackware. I would be honestly surprised if I had many other common characteristics with other Slackware users. (Other than being a human being of sorts.)
|
Humans are a whacky and crazy bunch...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
As long as Debian takes the GNU/kfreebsd and GNU/Hurd projects serious there is no way for them to switch to systemd. Since most distros out there are either derivatives of Debian or Ubuntu (I don't have any numbers on that, but I would guess that more than 50% are, with a userbase that is far larger than 50%), do we really have to fear a take over from systemd anywhere but in RPM distros and Arch?
(By the way, systemd in the debian repos is currently even in unstable at version 44, far from being in sync with upstream).
|
Yes, Debian and Gentoo both will probably never incorporate systemd in any regards. Slackware and LFS probably won't be incorporating it either due to the bloat it creates also.
With the rate of non-Linux kernels and operating systems like HURD, Illumos, BSD, and other kernels are going into heavy levels of development thanks to sponsorships from Google, such as Google's Summer of Code in which many projects go into extensive levels of development and research, as well as a lot of progress being made across the non-Linux UNIX/BSD world, chances are we could actually see more non-GNU/Linux operating systems become more and more relevant to the world of IT at large.
If this is the case, sysvinit might be going to probably be granted major overhauls and updates, or focus could be given to sysvinit compatible init systems like bsdinit, OpenRC, and even Upstart.
I guess to turn the tables on Lennart one could say, "Systemd just isn't relevant anymore to the development of Linux."
|